| Revision as of 17:47, 27 July 2007 editMastCell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators43,155 edits →Issues to be mediated: yes, it's bloated, but I disagree about the "why"← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:10, 27 July 2007 edit undoYilloslime (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,467 edits →Issues to be mediated: seems like this issue is not covered in last bullet point....Next edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| * Article text clearly at odds with information in sources | * Article text clearly at odds with information in sources | ||
| * Statements presented as factual rather than as scientific consensus and/or being attributed to their sources | * Statements presented as factual rather than as scientific consensus and/or being attributed to their sources | ||
| * Amount of space given to conflicting view point/] | |||
| * Unnecessarily bloating section of conflicting viewpoint(s), either through attempts to thoroughly discredit them at length rather than describe them objectively, or through attempts to give ] to small-minority positions. | * Unnecessarily bloating section of conflicting viewpoint(s), either through attempts to thoroughly discredit them at length rather than describe them objectively, or through attempts to give ] to small-minority positions. | ||
Revision as of 18:10, 27 July 2007
Passive smoking
view
edit
delete
watch
Filed: 14:05, July 19 2007 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Mickeyklein (talk · contribs · email)
- MastCell (talk · contribs · email)
- Yilloslime (talk · contribs · email)
- John Quiggin (talk · contribs · email)
- Chido6d (talk · contribs · email)
- Dessources (talk · contribs · email)
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
- Talk:Passive_smoking#Edits_by_User:Mickeyklein
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Passive_smoking#Chido6d.27s_edits
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Passive_smoking#POV_tag
Issues to be mediated
- Inclusion of "non-Government-backed material"
- WP:NPOV
- Suppression of IARC/World Health Organization study conclusion to apparently preserve activist viewpoint(s)
- Article text clearly at odds with information in sources
- Statements presented as factual rather than as scientific consensus and/or being attributed to their sources
- Unnecessarily bloating section of conflicting viewpoint(s), either through attempts to thoroughly discredit them at length rather than describe them objectively, or through attempts to give undue weight to small-minority positions.
Additional issues to be mediated
- Ad Hominem exclusion of evidence
- Use of talk page and talk page guidelines, and Misplaced Pages as a soapbox
- Representation of minority views in proportion to their acceptance among experts (WP:WEIGHT)
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree Mickeyklein 16:54, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree JQ 02:10, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. MastCell 04:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree.Yilloslime 04:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. Chido6d 22:34, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. Dessources 23:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Accept.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 01:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Adopting case'. Vassyana 03:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)