Misplaced Pages

User talk:InkSplotch: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:38, 16 July 2007 editInkSplotch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users821 edits Removed link?← Previous edit Revision as of 15:24, 30 July 2007 edit undoInkSplotch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users821 edits Tidying upNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Barnstar==

{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The da Vinci Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For doing my job for me: specifically, re-ordering the mire of proposed principles and FoFs on the ] arbitration case to make them readable. ]<sup>(])</sup> 17:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
|}

:Indeed - a very good job done there. ] ] 18:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

== IRC cloak request ==
I am InkSplotch on freenode and I would like
the cloak wikimedia/InkSplotch. Thanks. --] 01:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

Thanks for fixing the {{tl|oldafd}} tag I put on ]. I was in a rush at the time, and later forgot to look up the correct format. Cheers! ] ]</sup> ]</sub> 02:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

== Removed link? ==

Hello.
<br/>While although I found the link a bit... uh... weird... was there a specific reason you removed it? (I'm talking about the link on the wikimedia foundation discussion page, btw) ] 22:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

:Couple of reasons:
:*Wikitruth is widely regarded as an "Attack Site", and unreliable. Jimmy may be a subject of articles here, but he's also a ] and an Misplaced Pages editor.
:*Posting IRC chat logs, or direct links to them, without permission of all parties is direct violation of the IRC channel rules which is often upheld as a privacy violation here.
:*It's over six months old, and I doubt terribly relevant now.
:--] 23:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:24, 30 July 2007