Revision as of 18:15, 27 July 2007 editYilloslime (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,467 edits →Issues to be mediated: rereading my previous edit summary, i see that it's nonsense. I meant to say: It seems like this issue is now included in the last bullet point.← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:52, 31 July 2007 edit undoChido6d (talk | contribs)438 edits →Additional issues to be mediatedNext edit → | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* Use of talk page and ], and Misplaced Pages as a ] | * Use of talk page and ], and Misplaced Pages as a ] | ||
* Representation of minority views in proportion to their acceptance among experts (]) | * Representation of minority views in proportion to their acceptance among experts (]) | ||
* Suppression of relevant details, such as the identity of a Justice in a high profile lawsuit, possibly in order to mislead readers of the article. | |||
===Parties' agreement to mediate=== | ===Parties' agreement to mediate=== |
Revision as of 01:52, 31 July 2007
Passive smoking
view
edit
delete
watch
Filed: 14:05, July 19 2007 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Mickeyklein (talk · contribs · email)
- MastCell (talk · contribs · email)
- Yilloslime (talk · contribs · email)
- John Quiggin (talk · contribs · email)
- Chido6d (talk · contribs · email)
- Dessources (talk · contribs · email)
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
- Talk:Passive_smoking#Edits_by_User:Mickeyklein
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Passive_smoking#Chido6d.27s_edits
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Passive_smoking#POV_tag
Issues to be mediated
- Inclusion of "non-Government-backed material"
- WP:NPOV
- Suppression of IARC/World Health Organization study conclusion to apparently preserve activist viewpoint(s)
- Article text clearly at odds with information in sources
- Statements presented as factual rather than as scientific consensus and/or being attributed to their sources
- Unnecessarily bloating section of conflicting viewpoint(s), either through attempts to thoroughly discredit them at length rather than describe them objectively, or through attempts to give undue weight to small-minority positions.
Additional issues to be mediated
- Ad Hominem exclusion of evidence
- Use of talk page and talk page guidelines, and Misplaced Pages as a soapbox
- Representation of minority views in proportion to their acceptance among experts (WP:WEIGHT)
- Suppression of relevant details, such as the identity of a Justice in a high profile lawsuit, possibly in order to mislead readers of the article.
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree Mickeyklein 16:54, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree JQ 02:10, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. MastCell 04:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree.Yilloslime 04:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. Chido6d 22:34, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. Dessources 23:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Accept.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 01:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Adopting case'. Vassyana 03:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)