| Revision as of 23:00, 1 August 2007 editGregbard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers90,738 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:45, 2 August 2007 edit undoRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits cleanout old issuesNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| *] Request for involvment. The Article is being heavily influence by members the organisation's "Core Internet PR Team" in the last few months ]. See the article talk page. 17:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | *] Request for involvment. The Article is being heavily influence by members the organisation's "Core Internet PR Team" in the last few months ]. See the article talk page. 17:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *] Dispute about whether a saint used dreams to blackmail others and the use of an Italian language source we can't read. ----] <sup>(])</sup> 17:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | *] Dispute about whether a saint used dreams to blackmail others and the use of an Italian language source we can't read. ----] <sup>(])</sup> 17:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *] - dispute over whether the organization should be categorized under ], ], and ] 17:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| One disputed section is ] and another is ]. 04:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] - which sources should be used to establish figures? Should sources which mention ''if someone believes in a God'' vs. ''someone believes in a life force'' use this as an indication of Christianity? Does the cia.gov world factbook consitute a reliable source in and of itself? etc. | |||
| *] - link to ellinais.com, or ellinais.gr? 04:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] dispute about the inclusion of a statement that Shirdi Sai Baba's behavior was sometimes violent uncouth. 21:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]: There is a disagreement about whether a source is reliable. 19:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] over addition of material in this section . 18:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] this article seems very bad, many unverified statements 00:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] - after surviving two AfDs, there is a contested effort to replace the article with a redirect. 16:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign --> | <!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign --> | ||
Revision as of 12:45, 2 August 2007
Shortcut- ]
- Proposed deletion of List of isms. 23:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion about the fact that the bot has stopped tagging WikiProject Logic articles due to complaints. 22:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Great_Commission_Association#RfC_On_Selected_Sections Do the disputed sections make the article too long, or are they being removed for content. 21:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Socionomics#improper_synthesis Does it violate WP:SYN and WP:NOR to cite to Freud (and others who never heard of socionomics) as "support" for a neologism created years later? 00:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University#Inclusion_of_E.Romain.27s_website_as_an_external_link Discussion on whether this website should be included in the article as a reference/external link.* Romain, Eugene (2001). "Report on Child Abuse, Beliefs and Lifestyle within BKWSU". Retrieved 2007-07-28. 12:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:British Centre for Science Education Discussion involving verifiability and suitability of a specific quote.23:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion at WikiProject_Mathematics about removing "Mathematical logicians" from logicians category, et al.
- Ebionites Talk:Ebionites#Religious vegetarianism redux. We are having a recurring argument about undue weight and how to properly apply it. Are we obligated to include the opinions of fringe scholars, and where do we draw the line? Ovadyah 20:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Jan de Bakker. We are having a difference of opinion about the precise meaning of the word "Heretical". I would like to have some input from native speakers of English to clear up the issue, Talk:Jan de Bakker#Heretical. 14:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Vedas trying to add a content that states the presence of the Vedas being probably 5 against the commonly commonly known four.08:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Mathematical logic (Talk:Mathematical logic) -- approaching third revert of User:Trovatore, insisting that Mathematical logic is not logic. 02:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Religious discrimination against Neopagans (Talk:Religious discrimination against Neopagans#Denominations or religions?) is "various neopagan denominations" or "various neopagan religions" more correct? 13:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Muhammad: Is the "satanic verses" incident (not the Rushdie book, but the account of heretical verses being added to the Qur'an in Muhammad's day) to be reported as historical fact?14:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Religious discrimination against Asatruers (Talk:Religious_discrimination_against_Neopagans#Actual_debate_on_split): Should it be split? 18:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Persecution of Asatru (Talk:Persecution of Asatru#Request for Comment: Notability): Is it notable or not? 09:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Involution (philosophy) (talk): Dispute over whether to rename and move the article 14:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Infidel#Request_for_Comment:_Infidel_Dictionary_Terms: Dispute over Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages is not a dictionary. Should the article cover a dictionary term or be focused on the ecclesiastical term.--Tigeroo 16:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University Request for involvment. The Article is being heavily influence by members the organisation's "Core Internet PR Team" in the last few months here. See the article talk page. 17:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:John_Bosco#Request_for_comment Dispute about whether a saint used dreams to blackmail others and the use of an Italian language source we can't read. ----evrik 17:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)