| Revision as of 20:56, 8 June 2005 editCdc (talk | contribs)8,594 edits →Turning this article into a vanity page← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:04, 9 June 2005 edit undoRabbis (talk | contribs)18 edits →Removed vanity sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ===Removed vanity section=== | ===Removed vanity section=== | ||
| I've removed this entire section, except for one unrelated paragraph about the ADL that I moved to the beginning of its parent. This entire detailed description about a meeting held with John Paul II is unencyclopedic. As the (now-deleted) text notes, the pope had knighted into the ] at least seven or eight Jews; hence, he seems to meet with Jews pretty often, really. The meeting was undoubtedly special for the folks involved, but there's no evidence that it was important to ] in a broader sense. See also ] and ]. ] ] 20:56, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) | I've removed this entire section, except for one unrelated paragraph about the ADL that I moved to the beginning of its parent. This entire detailed description about a meeting held with John Paul II is unencyclopedic. As the (now-deleted) text notes, the pope had knighted into the ] at least seven or eight Jews; hence, he seems to meet with Jews pretty often, really. The meeting was undoubtedly special for the folks involved, but there's no evidence that it was important to ] in a broader sense. See also ] and ]. ] ] 20:56, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
| This event with the pope was the most positive event in relations between Israel, and the Vatican in 2,000 years of history. You want to fight the notability of this event? Personally, I do not see what you have against the entire event, as this is part of history. --] 13:04, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:04, 9 June 2005
"Jew" vs. "Jewish person"
Is there some reason the circumlocution "Jewish person" needs to be substituted for the simpler and shorter "Jew"? Is "Jew" some sort of dirty word? Jayjg 16:14, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
Jewish person is a more accurate description as "Jew" can sometimes have a negative anti-semitic connotation. Also this sounds better. Its like saying "The first black to be knighted" this sounds a little derogatory. Also if you don't want to use "Reverend Cantor", which is an elevated status, at least give the poor guy his proper title of Cantor. -Victor 6 May, 2005
- Jew as a noun is not anti-Semitic, and it is insulting to suggest it is. Jew is simply a description; it's like saying the "the first American to be nominated" etc., which is not at all derogatory, unless you think "American" is a bad word too. As for "Cantor", people aren't described by their titles multiple times in an encyclopedia article; he is described as a Cantor once, that's plenty. Jayjg 20:48, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
Turning this article into a vanity page
The text read:
- The artist Cantor Lawrence Eliezer Kepecs presented Pope John Paul II with a personally designed mezuzah inscribed with the "Priestly Blessing".
Um, thousands of people have presented the Pope, and other high ranking Catholic clergy, with gifts. Why is this one gift by this one man so important that it merits inclusion in this article? Is Cantor Kepecs a leading figure in Catholic-Jewish relations? Nope. He is just one of hundreds of Jewish people who have met the Pope. Let's not turn this article into a vanity page. RK 16:59, May 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, it's part of a campaign to make Kepecs as prominent as possible, and to promote the minor event as perhaps the most earth-shattering one of the 20th and 21st centuries. It should be deleted, as should article on Kepecs. Jayjg 18:17, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
My name is Reverend Cantor Victor I. Beck, President of the Jewish Ministers Cantors Association of America. I led the delegation of cantors - one of the 13 cantors who were selected to sing for the Pope on 1/18/05. It was a monumental event unprecedented in Judeo-Christian history. Rev. Cantor Kepecs gave the Pope a mezuzah that he created for that purpose - to show that the Jewish people really want to have reconcilliation with the Catholic church. The Pope very much wanted this meeting. Being the President of the oldest Cantorial organization (dating back to 1896)who had such illustrious members as Cantor Yossele Rosenblatt, Ben Zion Kapov Kagan, Chaskele Ritter, David Koussevitzky, Moshe Koussevitzky, Berele Chagy, Israel Alter, Mordechai Hershman, Adolf Katchko, Leib Glantz, Alter Yechiel Karniol, Zavel Kwartin, Samuel Malavsky, Shlomo Mendel, Yeshia Meissels Pierre Pinchik and many others, I feel in my expertise that Cantor Lawrence Eliezer Kepecs is more than a noteworthy cantor, he is an exceptional Cantor and artist, who deserves a page in your encyclopedia. I can only assume that those who wish to remove mention of Cantor Kepecs in this forum are either ill-informed or have other agendas which are not in keeping with the historical and informative nature of this forum.-Rev. Cantor Victor I Beck, President JMCA May 5, 2005
- This is an encyclopedia, not a "forum", and it contains information that is of encyclopedic value. Jayjg 20:51, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
Removed vanity section
I've removed this entire section, except for one unrelated paragraph about the ADL that I moved to the beginning of its parent. This entire detailed description about a meeting held with John Paul II is unencyclopedic. As the (now-deleted) text notes, the pope had knighted into the Order of St. Gregory at least seven or eight Jews; hence, he seems to meet with Jews pretty often, really. The meeting was undoubtedly special for the folks involved, but there's no evidence that it was important to Relations between Catholicism and Judaism in a broader sense. See also Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Gary Krupp and Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Lawrence Eliezer Kepecs. CDC (talk) 20:56, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This event with the pope was the most positive event in relations between Israel, and the Vatican in 2,000 years of history. You want to fight the notability of this event? Personally, I do not see what you have against the entire event, as this is part of history. --Rabbis 13:04, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)