| Revision as of 07:11, 4 June 2005 editThryduulf (talk | contribs)Oversighters, Administrators98,879 edits explanation of 3RR and my previous message← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:00, 9 June 2005 edit undo211.30.211.93 (talk) →reply from my talk pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *You can revert ] in the future, as long as you don't break the 3RR. That said, continutally reverting is not acceptable. If there are any disputes as to the content of an article the first step is to discuss in on the talk page - in this case ]. | *You can revert ] in the future, as long as you don't break the 3RR. That said, continutally reverting is not acceptable. If there are any disputes as to the content of an article the first step is to discuss in on the talk page - in this case ]. | ||
| I hope this helps. ] 07:11, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) | I hope this helps. ] 07:11, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
| This guy's Holocaust-denial neo-Nazi from Japan who thinks that Nanjing Massacre never happened. I hope North Korea nuke racist sh*ts like him to bits. | |||
Revision as of 11:00, 9 June 2005
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I note that you have already reverted Iris Chang 4 times today, but as you have not previously been warned I am not blocking you this time. I will block you if you make 1 more revert, or break the 3 revert rule in future. Thryduulf 10:27, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
reply from my talk page
I'm sorry for not explaining it so you could understand last time, I'll try again below.
- The Three Revert Rule (3RR) means that you can be blocked if you revert any page more than three times in any 24 period.
- user:Markalexander100 (who signs himself as just Mark) reported on the 3RR violations page - Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR - that you had reverted the Iris Chang article 4 times between 06:45 and 15:41 (both times UTC) yesterday (3 June).
- Normally this would mean that you would be blocked from editing for 24 hours. However, as you had not been warned about the rule I used my discretion and did not block you (obviously), but chose to warn you instead.
- When I wrote the warning method, what I meant was that if you made one more revert before 09:24 today (one 24 hours and 1 minute after the second revert), then I would block you for violating the rule. The second part means that as you have been warned, any time in the future you make 4 or more reverts in any 24 period you will be blocked.
- You can read the report Mark made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR#User:Flowerofchivalry, which details all the individual reverts.
- You can revert Iris Chang in the future, as long as you don't break the 3RR. That said, continutally reverting is not acceptable. If there are any disputes as to the content of an article the first step is to discuss in on the talk page - in this case talk:Iris Chang.
I hope this helps. Thryduulf 07:11, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This guy's Holocaust-denial neo-Nazi from Japan who thinks that Nanjing Massacre never happened. I hope North Korea nuke racist sh*ts like him to bits.