| Revision as of 06:37, 8 August 2007 edit6SJ7 (talk | contribs)4,258 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:56, 8 August 2007 edit undoSir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled18,508 edits zomg !votesNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| WP:SYNTH == WP:OR. Also WP:OR and WP:NPOV are both core policies, and if an article inherrantly fails the core policies and a large part of the !voters agree that they do (not not necessarily a majority) then there article should be deleted. Full stop. ]] 05:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | WP:SYNTH == WP:OR. Also WP:OR and WP:NPOV are both core policies, and if an article inherrantly fails the core policies and a large part of the !voters agree that they do (not not necessarily a majority) then there article should be deleted. Full stop. ]] 05:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :There is a big IF there -- IF the article "inherrantly" fails a core policy. It is a matter of opinion whether this particular article was OR. That being the case, it should have required a consensus of those opinions to delete the article. Instead it was deleted based on a majority. That is not what the deletion policy allows. Oh and by the way, do you think adding "Full stop" to your opinion changes it from an opinion into a fact? ] 06:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | :There is a big IF there -- IF the article "inherrantly" fails a core policy. It is a matter of opinion whether this particular article was OR. That being the case, it should have required a consensus of those opinions to delete the article. Instead it was deleted based on a majority. That is not what the deletion policy allows. Oh and by the way, do you think adding "Full stop" to your opinion changes it from an opinion into a fact? ] 06:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *Oooh, still equating consensus with !vote counting, are we? — ] ] 06:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:56, 8 August 2007
WP:SYNTH == WP:OR. Also WP:OR and WP:NPOV are both core policies, and if an article inherrantly fails the core policies and a large part of the !voters agree that they do (not not necessarily a majority) then there article should be deleted. Full stop. Viridae 05:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- There is a big IF there -- IF the article "inherrantly" fails a core policy. It is a matter of opinion whether this particular article was OR. That being the case, it should have required a consensus of those opinions to delete the article. Instead it was deleted based on a majority. That is not what the deletion policy allows. Oh and by the way, do you think adding "Full stop" to your opinion changes it from an opinion into a fact? 6SJ7 06:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oooh, still equating consensus with !vote counting, are we? — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 06:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)