Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:My knowledge doesn't stretch beyond yours. But since ] explained his moving of the page with '' 'ö' is the consistent transliteration. 'õ' was not yet consciously used; Masing hadn't invented it yet.'' I chose to be bold. --] 07:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
:My knowledge doesn't stretch beyond yours. But since ] explained his moving of the page with '' 'ö' is the consistent transliteration. 'õ' was not yet consciously used; Masing hadn't invented it yet.'' I chose to be bold. --] 07:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
::The 'õ' must have been my mistake. Itseemstohave been fixed by now. ] 09:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
::The 'õ' must have been my mistake. Thanks for fixing it. ] 09:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Lühhike öppetus is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia
I've held off making this change for lack of knowledge. The article begins by saying that it was called Lühhike öppetus at the time it was published, but it would be called Lühike õpetus nowadays. The "full title" as set out in the next paragraph uses a sort of hybrid orthography (Lühhike õppetus). Should the õ be replaced with an ö, since that would have been the full title when it was published, or is that wrong for some reason? BigHaz - Schreit mich an22:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
My knowledge doesn't stretch beyond yours. But since Digwuren explained his moving of the page with 'ö' is the consistent transliteration. 'õ' was not yet consciously used; Masing hadn't invented it yet. I chose to be bold. --Gf196107:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
