Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 22:21, 9 August 2007

Vintagekits

Hello. New editors don't typically turn up and immediately contribute to unblock discussions. This strongly suggests you are an editors with a history of interaction with Vk. While you have the right to editing anonymously if you wish, considering the circumstances, it is entirely reasonable for Vk to decline to interact with you.

Your query about Arbcom has been addressed and Vk is now unblocked, so the point is perhaps moot. If there is anything else you would like to say on the subject, then feel free to do so on my talkpage, but please obey Vk's wishes to stop editing on his talk page. Thanks. Rockpocket 21:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Your deletions

You are right we all have to obey the same rules. So do not delete my comments from someone else's talk page, SqueakBox 21:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

This is not acceptable. Please stop now or I will take action to stop you from continuing to harass Vk. He has made it very clear he does not wish to continue this discussion with you. Rockpocket 21:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Why is it edit warring by me to ask civil and pertinent questions?

Why have you now even censored the whole history of several weeks of contributions on Vintagekits talk page?

Is it because the history would show that I have not harassed anyone?

I think that you misunderstand your job here on Misplaced Pages, which is essentially to help ensure that editors may write an encyclopedia without enduring disruption and bad faith edits from Single Purpose Accounts and those that do not have a neutral and unbiassed outlook whatever the color of their passport

Thank you for your concern. With all due respect, I'm not sure its the best idea to take advice on how to be an administrator from someone who has yet to learn to sign their comments with four tiles ~~~~. Moreover, I have not deleted anything from Vintagekits talkpage other than your last comment. Could you elaborate on what you mean?

Finally, its interesting you mention Single Purpose Accounts, because your contributions do not appear to cover much editing space, what exactly is the purpose of your interaction with Vk? Rockpocket 22:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

As I made very clear earlier, I am not a new editor.

I am very sorry for not signing. I did not realise that I had that facility on an anonymous account - I've never posted from an IP address before. Now does this work84.13.156.208 22:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Vintagekits

Hello. New editors don't typically turn up and immediately contribute to unblock discussions. This strongly suggests you are an editors with a history of interaction with Vk. While you have the right to editing anonymously if you wish, considering the circumstances, it is entirely reasonable for Vk to decline to interact with you.

Your query about Arbcom has been addressed and Vk is now unblocked, so the point is perhaps moot. If there is anything else you would like to say on the subject, then feel free to do so on my talkpage, but please obey Vk's wishes to stop editing on his talk page. Thanks. Rockpocket 21:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello.

But I am not a new editor.

Where editors wish to contribute anonymously and have a good reason (eg: harassment) they are permitted, provided they are civil, to do so.

Why does Vkits get this extreme level of censorship permission?

Why does he not wish to communicate with me?

I don't know why Vk chooses not to communicate with you, perhaps its because he believes you are someone who has previously been in conflict with him. I don't care who you are, and you have every right to remain anonymous. But Vk can remove whatever he wishes from his talkpage. You do not have the right to continue to revert his page when he (and others) have made it clear your comments are not welcome. That is edit warring and bordering on harrassment. If you have something to say to Vk, do so here and I will draw his attention to it. If he chooses to interact with you, then fine, otherwise you will just have to accept he doesn't wish to communicate with you. Rockpocket 22:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

You say "revert his page" but that is being imprecise. I tried each time to restore the questions I was asking of him. And those questions were not harassing. They were simple questions like why he does not wish to communicate and censors the remarks of others. Surely our First Amendment rights count for something even when we are posted overseas?

Germans don't have First Amendment rights. Brixton Busters 22:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Your deletions

You are right we all have to obey the same rules. So do not delete my comments from someone else's talk page, SqueakBox 21:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

That was my mistake for which I humbly apologise.

It was not deliberate but accidental when huge chunks of your comments (and those of other editors were deleted). I am surprised that you do not deprecate blanking user pages and selectively (and intentionally) removing comments from other editors.

I think its important we give VK another chance. And absolutely vital that we dont wind him up in these first hours of freedom, SqueakBox 22:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm very sorry. I did not realise he had been jailed. I will stop at once.