| Revision as of 07:44, 13 August 2007 editDownwards (talk | contribs)24,856 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:18, 13 August 2007 edit undoVanishedUser ewrfgdg3df3sdad (talk | contribs)208 edits →Behavioral guidelinesNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| --] 07:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | --] 07:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :But lil' champ, my edits aren't creating work for anybody but you! You are reverting people's work, insulting them, and pushing your view of how wikipedia works. I have added citations to things, cleaned up wording etc, and put verifiable facts back into articles that you have removed for spite. If that makes things harder for you then good, you aren't a positive force here, things need to be hard for you. Seriously, lil' champ, I'm not the troll here. | |||
Revision as of 23:18, 13 August 2007
bricklaying?
Hey there
Are you really a bricklayer? Wiki has a shortage of experts in masonry and brick laying.
Justforasecond 18:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
RE: Your personal attack during Dražen Petrović edit
Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. --Downwards 00:45, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
You spend all day at the damn computer messing up work by somebodies and you have nothing to say for it when you get called out? Seriously what is the point of what you do? Just undoing reasonable edits to aggravate regular people so you can feel 'portant, I'm done i've said my piece so unless you can explain yourself I expect not to hear anything else from you. KatoABJV 01:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- No, I posit that your edit was not reasonable. Re-adding a sentence in the introduction that has no validity in terms of independent verification is not reasonable. The point of what I do is maintain the integrity and moderately high level of researched information here on this site, as it should be with all editors. My impression of your poor edits is that you do not wish to follow the rules. If you want to add rubbish, go create your own blog and do that. If you had taken the time to read the rules regarding citing sources, you wouldn't be in the unfortunate position you're in. You're very lucky I did not remove the part where you stated Petrovic was inducted in the Hall of Fame in 2007 — you failed to cite. Also, the information you place in the Larry Robinson article from April was of a substandard nature. Frankly, it was not good and thus deservedly excised. My regret is that I did not remove this sooner. In the meantime, look at fixing your own faults before pointing them out in others. Goodbye. --Downwards 03:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
But I didn't even add that to drazen petrovic! Somebody who could be anybody did that and I saw you ruined their work so I reverted back to it after checking their facts. My unfortunate position? What the hell are you talking about? hahahaha no! god forbid the people don't know that Larry Robinson is a great shooter in NBA live 2003! I'm going to lose sleep about that one buddy. But like I said i'm done with you, obviously you aren't cool enough to pay attention to. KatoABJV 03:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Can't make your mind up
| “ | But like I said i'm done with you, obviously you aren't cool enough to pay attention to. | ” |
- KatoABJV 03:24, 6 August 2007
What a flip-flop, eh? :) --Downwards 02:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Yeah because you keep messing with people, hahaha i'm fightin for justice pal KatoABJV 02:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- You are my hero. --Downwards 22:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- that's cool, look i don't mean to be intentionally extremely insightful but seriously you don't have to be a dick to people and talk to them like their points are useless. From reading the comments on your page obviously many people have tried to be reasonable with you but you don't listen, so I decided to be extremely unreasonable. I obviously don't have the free time you do but i'll keep at it as long as you continue to act like you own the place. But if you want a truce i'm open.
WP:CVU status
The Misplaced Pages:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Special Barnstar
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| I award myself this very special barnstar for my work counteracting very unspecial condescending nobodies that use wiki to make themselves feel less insignificant. Grandma was right, I AM special KatoABJV 20:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC) |
Behavioral guidelines
In regards to your recent troll-like behavior, please familiarise yourself with:
- Don't disrupt Misplaced Pages to illustrate a point
- By all means state your point. But don't spam Misplaced Pages, disingenously nominate articles for deletion, push rules to their limits or otherwise create work for other people just to "prove your point".
--Downwards 07:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- But lil' champ, my edits aren't creating work for anybody but you! You are reverting people's work, insulting them, and pushing your view of how wikipedia works. I have added citations to things, cleaned up wording etc, and put verifiable facts back into articles that you have removed for spite. If that makes things harder for you then good, you aren't a positive force here, things need to be hard for you. Seriously, lil' champ, I'm not the troll here.