Revision as of 05:00, 17 August 2007 editMeganium100 (talk | contribs)4 edits ←Replaced page with 'Image:kitten.jpg'← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:00, 17 August 2007 edit undoWknight94 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users89,452 editsm Reverted edits by Meganium100 (talk) to last version by Wknight94Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
] | |||
|algo = old(3d) | |||
|archive = User talk:ClueBot/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s | |||
}} | |||
'''''This page is for comments on the bot or questions about the bot'''.''<br /> | |||
''Report false positives on the ], '''not here'''.''<br /> | |||
''Praise should go on the ].''<br /> | |||
''Use the little "+" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each header to edit that header.''<br /> | |||
''This page is automatically archived by ]. Click ] for a list of archives.'' | |||
== 1RR? == | |||
Is there a reason why there is a limit to the number of times the bot can revert an article per day? I don't think any of the other bots have this limitation and removing this limit (or at least raising it to something like 5) would help ClueBot remove more vandalism. Just a suggestion. Congrats on getting the bot approved, it has done a lot of work toward removing vandalism. :) --] ] 05:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
:This was due to popular consensus in and . It was to prevent edit wars on false positives. -- ]<sup>(]|]|]|])</sup> 06:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Woops== | |||
Sorry about the block template. I think the ] got away from me a bit. —] (]) 02:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:00, 17 August 2007
This page is for comments on the bot or questions about the bot.
Report false positives on the false positives page, not here.
Praise should go on the praise page.
Use the little "+" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each header to edit that header.
This page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Click here for a list of archives.
1RR?
Is there a reason why there is a limit to the number of times the bot can revert an article per day? I don't think any of the other bots have this limitation and removing this limit (or at least raising it to something like 5) would help ClueBot remove more vandalism. Just a suggestion. Congrats on getting the bot approved, it has done a lot of work toward removing vandalism. :) --Hdt83 Chat 05:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- This was due to popular consensus in #wikipedia-en and #wikipedia-BAG. It was to prevent edit wars on false positives. -- Cobi 06:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Woops
Sorry about the block template. I think the Lupin tool got away from me a bit. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)