Revision as of 18:38, 18 August 2007 editDeskana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,062 editsm moved User talk:देसीफ्राल to User talk:Phral: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "देसीफ्राल" to "Phral"← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:32, 19 August 2007 edit undoDark Tea (talk | contribs)3,238 edits white britishNext edit → | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:Hmm, I did not know that. Seems to be an odd policy, but a policy all the same. Thanks, --] 05:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC) | :Hmm, I did not know that. Seems to be an odd policy, but a policy all the same. Thanks, --] 05:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
==White British== | |||
The ] article is being ] by anti-white forces. Please help as soon as possible.----<sup><i><font color="darkslateblue">]</font></i></sup><font color="purple">]</font><font color="darkslateblue">]</font> 08:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:32, 19 August 2007
Your Username
Your username "देसीफ्राल" is not made with letters in the Latin alphabet. WP:USERNAME says to create a username with letters from the Latin alphabet, so other editors can distinguish your username.----Tea 06:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- As a courtesy, not a requirement. --देसीफ्राल 02:39, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Your username appears to say "Desipheral".----Tea 02:28, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Would you be so kind to create a redirect to your user and user talk page in the Latin alphabet? I'd also recommend that you include this Latinised name in your signature, as required by Misplaced Pages:Signatures#Non-Latin. Melsaran 12:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- It is not a requirement, according to the page you link. Hornplease 18:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Photo at WP
Hi, and thanks for helping with the missing photo. Although I like the photo of the Austrian woman, it is of an unknown model while the rest of the people have verifiable heritage to a particular nationality or ethnic group. Minor nit. But above all thanks for the support. Cheers! --Kevin Murray 08:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Cheers Kevin, I haven't gotten too involved in the whole issue, just didn't want to see that empty spot! If there's a better photo you think is more suitable, by all means change it. --देसीफ्राल 08:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! I was looking for one, but couldn't find another greek woman and the Olympia D. photo was deleted. Talk to you soon. --Kevin Murray 08:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
3RR warning
Please note that Misplaced Pages policy forbids doing reverts (for example, deletion) more than 3 times within 24 hours. If you violate this rule, your account will be blocked by an administrator. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 12:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
White people
You beat me to it! A perfect piece of OR. It is like he is incapable of using sources! I just love how he specified that Lebanon is in Asia. Anyway, let's keep that in mind for the inevitable RFC. The Behnam 04:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, so basically the checkuser was saying, "It's so obvious that it is an abusive sockpuppet that there is no need to run a checkuser." That's something, though I'd prefer that they actually run the checkuser for evidence-related reasons. Somehow the way it is now doesn't make it clear that the sockpuppet belongs to Muntuwandi, specifically. Anyhow, we can still get Gongdong-whatever blocked, I think by simple request at ANI. I'll ask clarification from Deskana about it being Muntuwandi's sockpuppet. The Behnam 04:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ramdrake and Muntuwandi may be the same? That would be, well, very very clever abuse if that is the case. I've noticed that Ramdrake defends Muntuwandi too much, even at times when Muntuwandi's actions are indefensible, but aside from that they seem different to me. If some stronger or more specific evidence does surface, however, please leave me a note.
- Anyway, I've asked Deskana for clarification about what sort of conclusions can be drawn from the CU case. It is at User talk:Deskana#Request, if you are interested in following. In the meantime, I suppose I'll leave a note at ANI asking for a block of Gongdong based upon Deskana's recommendation. The Behnam 04:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Just to give you a heads up, the block for Gondwanaland has been requested at WP:ANI#Block request per CU recommendation. Cheers. The Behnam 04:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Anyway, I've asked Deskana for clarification about what sort of conclusions can be drawn from the CU case. It is at User talk:Deskana#Request, if you are interested in following. In the meantime, I suppose I'll leave a note at ANI asking for a block of Gongdong based upon Deskana's recommendation. The Behnam 04:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note that User:Ramdrake is retired. It is a weird timing, given all the talk about similarities between Muntuwandi and him and Jeeny retiring...KarenAER 11:31, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
RFC for Muntuwandi
I believe he comprimises the integrity of Misplaced Pages. Look at his history. If he is like he is in White people article in all other articles, that's really sad for Misplaced Pages. I believe we have more than enough material about him but I feel lazy about pulling all the evidence together and starting a RFC. Will you be willing to do that? Here is some headstart: I'll ask the same to fourdee. Dbachmann already said, he would sign it but cant be bothered about starting one... KarenAER 11:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- It would be my pleasure, I would have done it before now but I have been quite busy this week in the 'real' world. So I'll put something together this weekend, and hopefully wipe this little smudge from Misplaced Pages.
- And yes, in response to your comment above, it is very peculiar timing, with various suspicions of sockpuppetry being raised. Hopefully now we will be able to concentrate on some real construction of the articles rather than just reverting and trying to remove the constant onslaught of bias, original research, and points of view these editors have been bringing to Misplaced Pages. --देसीफ्राल 11:37, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Your civility
Your statement that User:Muntuwandi "needs an indefinite block" on this edit is against WP:CIVIL which says to not call for bans or blocks.----Tea© 05:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, I did not know that. Seems to be an odd policy, but a policy all the same. Thanks, --देसीफ्राल 05:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
White British
The White British article is being proposed for deletion by anti-white forces. Please help as soon as possible.----Tea© 08:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)