Misplaced Pages

Talk:Lithium (Nirvana song): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:38, 6 November 2004 editArmy1987 (talk | contribs)4,449 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:23, 6 November 2004 edit undoLGagnon (talk | contribs)14,868 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


The only clue for which this song should be considered about religion is the line "Light my candles in a daze 'cause I've found God". It's not quite obvious. I think this song has no "surface meaning", but it's intentionally hard to interpretate.--] 11:38, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC) The only clue for which this song should be considered about religion is the line "Light my candles in a daze 'cause I've found God". It's not quite obvious. I think this song has no "surface meaning", but it's intentionally hard to interpretate.--] 11:38, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:Well, what I wrote is the meaning most often attributed to the song. I don't think it should be removed, since many have interpretted it that way, but if you want to add other interpretations then you can. -- ]]] 15:23, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:23, 6 November 2004

Where did you read the meaning of the song? Elsewhere I couldn't find any two people agreeing on it, however most of them don't think it's about religion.

I simply gave the surface meaning of the song; that at least deserves some mention. Further interpretation may or may not be needed; I'll leave that open to other editors to decide on. -- ] 19:57, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)

The only clue for which this song should be considered about religion is the line "Light my candles in a daze 'cause I've found God". It's not quite obvious. I think this song has no "surface meaning", but it's intentionally hard to interpretate.--Army1987 11:38, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Well, what I wrote is the meaning most often attributed to the song. I don't think it should be removed, since many have interpretted it that way, but if you want to add other interpretations then you can. -- ] 15:23, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)