User talk:Biggspowd: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 05:02, 21 August 2007 view sourceFamicomJL (talk \| contribs)3,364 edits Don't bother Biggspowd, you're not even SUPPOSED to blank your talk page← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:34, 21 August 2007 view source The Parsnip! (talk \| contribs)4,098 edits please stop subverting your blockNext edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== August 2007 ==		== August 2007 ==
	<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' for a period of '''3 months''' from editing in accordance with ] for persistent ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. - ] \| ] 02:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-vblock -->		<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' for a period of '''3 months''' from editing in accordance with ] for persistent ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. - ] \| ] 02:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-vblock -->

			== Reverting your "good" edits ==
			Let's see, how many temper tantrums does this make in the month of August? How many times are you going to storm off, say "fuck you all", and "retire", only to come back and resume editing? You're blocked for a week and that means you can't edit for a week, including your own talk page. The only thing you're allowed to do when you're blocked is request an unblock, which you've done. Unfortunately, the unblock request was denied. Continuing to edit your talk page is block avoidance, which behavior will get you blocked for increasingly longer periods of time. As for your "anti-smoking slant" edits, it reeks of ] and ], and most definitely is tendentious editing. I hope you will take this week to reevaluate your strategy. ] 13:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:34, 21 August 2007

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Biggspowd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a persistent vandal, I made a slight error as I accidentally put something I intended to put on a message board. This block is very harsh, and I am a good editor, I would appreciate if it could be removed. Thank you in advance.

Decline reason:

Putting this anywhere will get you blocked. And your removal of "anti-smoking slants" aren't stellar either. — Kurykh 02:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You put "BOW DOWN TO THE KING, HE IS BACK!@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in an article about Triple H. You have a history of vandalism, including a string of blocks as long as my arm. I'll let another admin review it, but I personally wouldn't be inclined to lift it. - Philippe | Talk 02:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

I will, however, reduce the length of the block. It was excessively long (I didn't see that your 1 month block was a mistake, so this was unprogressive). - Philippe | Talk 02:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

That's better, but I want it totally removed, I have various AFDs in progress, and 800 good edits are a lot better than 2 bad edits, I am a good editor. I made a slight mistake. Biggspowd 02:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

You made a series of mistakes. Sorry, I'm as willing as the next guy to offer a second chance... but not a fifth. Three bad edits are a coincidence. Four are a pattern. Five are a habit. Kurykh has declined your unblock and I endorse that. - Philippe | Talk 02:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

You have been blocked for a period of 3 months from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. - Philippe | Talk 02:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Reverting your "good" edits

Let's see, how many temper tantrums does this make in the month of August? How many times are you going to storm off, say "fuck you all", and "retire", only to come back and resume editing? You're blocked for a week and that means you can't edit for a week, including your own talk page. The only thing you're allowed to do when you're blocked is request an unblock, which you've done. Unfortunately, the unblock request was denied. Continuing to edit your talk page is block avoidance, which behavior will get you blocked for increasingly longer periods of time. As for your "anti-smoking slant" edits, it reeks of WP:POINT and WP:SOAP, and most definitely is tendentious editing. I hope you will take this week to reevaluate your strategy. The Parsnip! 13:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)