Revision as of 13:48, 16 June 2005 editDJ Clayworth (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,564 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:28, 16 June 2005 edit undoLinuxbeak (talk | contribs)7,320 edits ConcernsNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
MARMOT. Your proposed policy "Adminstators can't vote" is very hard to understand, largely because you have overused questions marks. For example, when you write "Judges can't vote in General Elections?" it's not clear if this is a question to which you want an answer (the answer is yes they can), or a statement (since you have put question marks after other statements) or an ironic comment (which would tend to argue against your proposal). Your proposal would be much better recieved if you went and tidied up the English. Thanks. ] 13:48, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) | MARMOT. Your proposed policy "Adminstators can't vote" is very hard to understand, largely because you have overused questions marks. For example, when you write "Judges can't vote in General Elections?" it's not clear if this is a question to which you want an answer (the answer is yes they can), or a statement (since you have put question marks after other statements) or an ironic comment (which would tend to argue against your proposal). Your proposal would be much better recieved if you went and tidied up the English. Thanks. ] 13:48, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
== Concerns == | |||
Marmot, I have been noticing some disturbing trends going on here. You immediately posted on ], which is something that a newcomer generally does not do. You also seem to be holding several grudges, and now you have just opposed every RFA that was active. I am concerned about your actions, and I am requesting that you stop this behavior. Please contribute to Misplaced Pages instead of disrupting it. ] | ] | ] 14:28, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:28, 16 June 2005
Hi MARMOT, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.
Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.
Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) 15:17, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
Thank you, I will do that.
62.253.96.40
Why did you edit this anon Talk page with an edit summary that referred to it as yours? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:13, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
MARMOT. Your proposed policy "Adminstators can't vote" is very hard to understand, largely because you have overused questions marks. For example, when you write "Judges can't vote in General Elections?" it's not clear if this is a question to which you want an answer (the answer is yes they can), or a statement (since you have put question marks after other statements) or an ironic comment (which would tend to argue against your proposal). Your proposal would be much better recieved if you went and tidied up the English. Thanks. DJ Clayworth 13:48, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Concerns
Marmot, I have been noticing some disturbing trends going on here. You immediately posted on Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/64.62.161.12, which is something that a newcomer generally does not do. You also seem to be holding several grudges, and now you have just opposed every RFA that was active. I am concerned about your actions, and I am requesting that you stop this behavior. Please contribute to Misplaced Pages instead of disrupting it. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 14:28, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)