Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Claudia Newman: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:47, 17 June 2005 editTagTeam (talk | contribs)19 edits →[]← Previous edit Revision as of 16:53, 17 June 2005 edit undoMARMOT (talk | contribs)161 edits →[]Next edit →
Line 44: Line 44:
*'''Delete''' - rubbish backed up by sockpuppets, possible copyvio picture. More pseudo-postmodernist experimentation? - ] 10:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - rubbish backed up by sockpuppets, possible copyvio picture. More pseudo-postmodernist experimentation? - ] 10:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Nope, not a copyright violation, she said she gave the photo to a friend- '] 10:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam' Nope, not a copyright violation, she said she gave the photo to a friend- '] 10:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'

*'' "Keep" '' ] 16:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:53, 17 June 2005

Claudia Newman

Hoax. -- Longhair | Talk 10:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • There is a URL from a news site linked in the article that proves that the story is completely false. The name does not even match that of the article.
  • Delete -- Longhair | Talk 10:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ambi 10:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete -- Could the spammer please stop? RussellG 10:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • There is no basis for that claim.
Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 10:58, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • The article you linked to yourself disproves your article.
Unsigned comment above from RussellG -- Longhair | Talk 11:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • It most certainly does not
Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 11:24, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Sign your posts people. After your comment, use four of these ~~~~ -- Longhair | Talk 11:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I see no evidence it disproves it (JoJo)
Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 11:29, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Comment: CzechPartisan's only edits are to VfD. -- Longhair | Talk 13:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Quite so, no need to get snarky. Given your reasoning thus far it seems this is only a popularity contest anyway. Go whine to the T-man about it. 'JoJo 13:52, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'
  • Strong delete, as soon as possible. Also, votes by sockpuppets shouldn't be counted. Columbia 13:54, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Hey, they called you a sock puppet! Not like your votes which we must assume as legit... 'JoJo 13:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo' Keep Matthewleung87 14:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep Jamesss 14:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Sockpuppets Proto 14:35, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • DeleteLectonar 14:55, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Nonsense. --Habap 15:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, hoax. Alphax  15:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I sense... a great disturbance... in sockpuppets. Delete. jglc | t | c 15:07, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nice cleavage — unconfirmed; no google match; likely hoax. — RJH 15:18, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • "Above photo of offending material" - heh. -- Jonel | Speak 02:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete hoax, nothing in the news article supports what is said here. --Etacar11 16:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete if the article makes anyone notable, it's the girl, not her "mother". Septentrionalis 18:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete sock supported hoax. Capitalistroadster 01:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Strongest Keep having spoken to some friends of mine, they assure me this is worth keeping. I agree wholeheartedly- 'Hotpants 07:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Hotpants'

    • Users only edits are to vote keep on Longhair's VFD nominations. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:13, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • okay, keep, but only because of the tits. Last one, geez 'TagTeam 07:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'
    • Users only edits are to vote keep on Longhair's VFD nominations. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - Sockpuppet-backed hoax. This is a recording. --FCYTravis 09:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep- very good form, and lack of a persuasive argument that it is fiction- 'Freezer 10:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Freezer'
  • Delete - rubbish backed up by sockpuppets, possible copyvio picture. More pseudo-postmodernist experimentation? - Skysmith 10:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nope, not a copyright violation, she said she gave the photo to a friend- 'TagTeam 10:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'

  • "Keep" MARMOT 16:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)