| Revision as of 01:40, 7 October 2003 edit24.222.105.251 (talk)No edit summary | Revision as of 00:05, 8 October 2003 edit undoJtdirl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,275 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| He does require a stretch of the imagination every once in a while, but his historical analysis of the Royal Family of England, the Christian religion, etc. is very well supported. Even many of his 'reptilian' claims have large amounts of evidence to support them. | He does require a stretch of the imagination every once in a while, but his historical analysis of the Royal Family of England, the Christian religion, etc. is very well supported. Even many of his 'reptilian' claims have large amounts of evidence to support them. | ||
| Did you forget to take your tablets today? ] 00:05, 8 Oct 2003 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:05, 8 October 2003
However strange Icke's views are, they deserve more credit than they get. They are very far outside of regular, especially larval human reality tunnels.
He does require a stretch of the imagination every once in a while, but his historical analysis of the Royal Family of England, the Christian religion, etc. is very well supported. Even many of his 'reptilian' claims have large amounts of evidence to support them.
Did you forget to take your tablets today? FearÉIREANN 00:05, 8 Oct 2003 (UTC)