Misplaced Pages

talk:Articles for deletion/My.BarackObama.com: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:00, 27 August 2007 editItaliavivi (talk | contribs)2,551 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:04, 27 August 2007 edit undoItaliavivi (talk | contribs)2,551 edits It was the three notability criteria from WP:WEB, not "the entire text." Please correct your false statement.Next edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
Participants in this discussion have ignored my comments about ], and here on the page through edit warring. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Participants in this discussion have ignored my comments about ], and here on the page through edit warring. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
:Because copying the entire text of ] into an AfD is unnecessary. As I said before, you are free to link to ] and point out what you feel are arguments made that are not in line with ]. ] 16:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC) :Because copying the entire text of ] into an AfD is unnecessary. As I said before, you are free to link to ] and point out what you feel are arguments made that are not in line with ]. ] 16:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
::You achieved your means through edit warring. I have nothing to discuss with you here. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC) ::It was not the entire text at all, it was just the three notability criteria and nothing more; please correct your remarks. You achieved your means through edit warring. I have nothing to discuss with you here. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
:::Um, ]? ] 16:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC) :::Um, ]? ] 16:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
::::Sorry, do you have anything to offer the actual discussion other than removing ]'s notability criteria via edit warring? ]<sup>]</sup> 17:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC) ::::Sorry, do you have anything to offer the actual discussion other than removing ]'s notability criteria via edit warring? ]<sup>]</sup> 17:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:04, 27 August 2007

Opposition to stating WP:WEB's notability criteria

Participants in this discussion have ignored my comments about WP:WEB, and two editors have prevented me from providing the criteria here on the page through edit warring. Italia 16:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Because copying the entire text of WP:WEB into an AfD is unnecessary. As I said before, you are free to link to WP:WEB and point out what you feel are arguments made that are not in line with WP:WEB. Leuko 16:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
It was not the entire text at all, it was just the three notability criteria and nothing more; please correct your remarks. You achieved your means through edit warring. I have nothing to discuss with you here. Italia 16:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Um, WP:KETTLE? Leuko 16:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, do you have anything to offer the actual discussion other than removing WP:WEB's notability criteria via edit warring? Italia 17:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Do let me know when you retract your attacks and accusations of "canvassing," WebHamster. Italia 16:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)