| Revision as of 02:49, 6 December 2005 editHereToHelp (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,936 editsm formatting← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:01, 28 August 2007 edit undoCultural Freedom (talk | contribs)1,294 edits →Possible moveNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Possible move== | ==Possible move== | ||
| To be consistent with the Misplaced Pages article ], would not a move to <nowiki>]</nowiki> be appropriate. ] ] | To be consistent with the Misplaced Pages article ], would not a move to <nowiki>]</nowiki> be appropriate. ] ] | ||
| : Perhaps better would be to switch the ''humour'' article back to ''humor'', where the article started (it was changed, in violation of WP guidelines, some time ago). --] ] 2007-08-28 21:01 21:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Include link to ] or not?== | ==Include link to ] or not?== | ||
Revision as of 21:01, 28 August 2007
Possible move
To be consistent with the Misplaced Pages article humour, would not a move to ] be appropriate. Mintguy (T)
- Perhaps better would be to switch the humour article back to humor, where the article started (it was changed, in violation of WP guidelines, some time ago). --Cultural Freedom talk 2007-08-28 21:01 21:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Include link to Category:Misplaced Pages humor or not?
I think we should, it's disambiguating, and it is humor. It's just a link. Go to image and there's a link to Misplaced Pages:image. Let's just put it in; it's not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no space requirement, and after all, it's just a link. --HereToHelp (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)