Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Curie Metropolitan High School: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:27, 30 August 2007 editBigtimepeace (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,491 edits keep← Previous edit Revision as of 20:43, 30 August 2007 edit undoHersfold (talk | contribs)33,142 editsm []: KeepNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
*'''Strong Keep''' This is a mainstream Chicago Public High School! There are plenty of newspaper articles available as sources: , . (And these are just articles that have Curie in the headline or byline.) I would volunteer to clean up the article myself, but unfortunately I've recently lost my free access to the Tribune archives. ] 19:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC) *'''Strong Keep''' This is a mainstream Chicago Public High School! There are plenty of newspaper articles available as sources: , . (And these are just articles that have Curie in the headline or byline.) I would volunteer to clean up the article myself, but unfortunately I've recently lost my free access to the Tribune archives. ] 19:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per Zagalejo. Apparently we don't have a firm policy on school notability, but given that the Chicago Tribune has published multiple articles about it I think it clearly passes. Also in Lexis/Nexis there was an old article mentioning a teacher from this school who received a national teaching award (Laura Bush was at the ceremony). Anyhow it seems we allow most articles on schools to exist, so I don't see why this one would be any different.--] <small>| ] | ]</small> 20:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC) *'''Keep''' per Zagalejo. Apparently we don't have a firm policy on school notability, but given that the Chicago Tribune has published multiple articles about it I think it clearly passes. Also in Lexis/Nexis there was an old article mentioning a teacher from this school who received a national teaching award (Laura Bush was at the ceremony). Anyhow it seems we allow most articles on schools to exist, so I don't see why this one would be any different.--] <small>| ] | ]</small> 20:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' the general consensus on high schools (if I recall correctly, I know there's nothing "official" and so such assumptions are going to be shaky at best regardless of who makes them) seems to be that they are inherently notable, and the newspaper articles above certainly allow it to pass. ''''']''''' <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 20:43, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:43, 30 August 2007

Curie Metropolitan High School

Curie Metropolitan High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete WP:N not established. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep This is a mainstream Chicago Public High School! There are plenty of newspaper articles available as sources: , . (And these are just articles that have Curie in the headline or byline.) I would volunteer to clean up the article myself, but unfortunately I've recently lost my free access to the Tribune archives. Zagalejo 19:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Zagalejo. Apparently we don't have a firm policy on school notability, but given that the Chicago Tribune has published multiple articles about it I think it clearly passes. Also in Lexis/Nexis there was an old article mentioning a teacher from this school who received a national teaching award (Laura Bush was at the ceremony). Anyhow it seems we allow most articles on schools to exist, so I don't see why this one would be any different.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 20:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep the general consensus on high schools (if I recall correctly, I know there's nothing "official" and so such assumptions are going to be shaky at best regardless of who makes them) seems to be that they are inherently notable, and the newspaper articles above certainly allow it to pass. Hersfold 20:43, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Categories: