Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:38, 4 September 2007

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archive

WP:CVU status

The Misplaced Pages:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Misplaced Pages is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you.

The above comment was copied and posted onto your talkpage because it applies equally to you. I offer to talk things over so that some very blatant NPOV problems can be resolve. Otherwise, you will be getting into an unnecessary edit war, as your changes are not at all neutral and inappropriate. Please remain cool in your discussions and maintain objectivity. It is inappropriate to clothe your political agendas in Misplaced Pages articles.

Thank you. 67.81.31.122 14:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Wiseguy, my undoing other mpov revisions on the Lubavitcher and Medrash Shmuel are entirely appropriate. Your continuous abuse on my talk page, however, is not. Please stop writing disingenuous posts on my talk page and answer my questions. Otherwise you will be warned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.81.31.122 (talk)

Chaim Dov Keller

This article you nominated for WP:PROD was deleted, but subsequently contested and has now been restored. You may nominate it for AFD if you wish. Thank you, — xaosflux 00:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

• Dear Pinchas: It is actually quite sad that you went ahead and prodded the article. For the record, here is what I wrote to User:Xaosflux when I noticed this highly unusual action: "Hello Xaosflux: Could you please explain why you chose to delete the article about Rabbi Chaim Dov Keller as reported: "01:09, 6 August 2007 Xaosflux deleted "Chaim Dov Keller" (content was: 'dated prod|concern = concern|not notable under WP:BIO|month = July|day = 31|year = 2007|time = 02:52)"? Why did you prod this article about a very famous currently living rabbi? Did you consult some editors familair with this topic? Did you place a question at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Judaism or at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism? Rabbi Chaim Dov Keller is probably one of the best known rabbis in Chicago at the present time. He is not a congregational rabbi, but serves as the rosh yeshiva ("dean") of the largest yeshiva in Chicago. He is mentioned in key articles relating to Haredi Judaism. A Google search for "Chaim Dov Keller" yields over 470 hits (a large number for such a person in the world of Orthodox Judaism) many connected to numerous and significant publications in the world of American Orthodox Judaism and particularly Haredi Judaism for which he is leading spokesman and scholar with Agudath Israel of America. He co-heads the Telshe yeshiva (Chicago) and he has played a major role is speaking out on the issue of the messianic claims concerning Rabbi M.M. Schneerson of Lubavitch, see Controversies of Chabad#The soul as "the essence of God". Kindly restore the article ASAP. Thank you." IZAK 07:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

representing fairly and without bias all significant views

Your edits in the krinsky article is with bias against all Chasidim who believe that the rebbe is moshiach. Thus showing blatant disregard towards wikipedia's policy. please rtefrain from this behavior —Preceding unsigned comment added by Golfertig (talk • contribs) 22:23, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Etiquette

Hello PinchasC: Gut Voch. As a Misplaced Pages admin you should be doubly cautious when going about your business and following your heart's desires on Misplaced Pages. Take a good look at Misplaced Pages:Etiquette for a start! While you have the right to nominate articles for deletion, it is very disappointing to see that you did not follow some very basic Misplaced Pages:Etiquette when nominating the Rabbi Chaim Dov Keller article first for prodding and then for deletion. You know quite well that Rabbi Keller is an important rosh yeshiva in the Litvish Agudath Israel of America world, so why did you prod it of all things? So you should have at least asked for some input from other editors before you prodded the article for deletion. Now that it has been restored, you have again ignored Misplaced Pages:Etiquette because you did not inform the original creator of the article, see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion: "...While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the articles that you are nominating for deletion... on User talk:David Spart which I have now done. Furthermore, why didn't you also place a notification on the very important Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism page so that editors who keep track of these nominations can get a chance to see for themselves what's going on, or don't you care about all this stuff? It's hard to know. I trust that these words are understood in the spirit in which they are made. Sincerely, IZAK 08:15, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

A Question

PinchasC, if I ask you a question, will you be willing to answer? It has nothing to do with the disagreement on the Chabad article, but rather about the article for a New Age writer who was very antisemitic . Kwork 11:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Hareidim and Zionism

Dear admin, i would like u to read the talk page of Haredim and Zionism regarding the grave concern that the current version is slanderous POV to say that all other Hasidim who r not satmar do support Zionism, (Its a long standing satmar belief that since u take money and u vote u r supporting Zionism.) the main user responsible for injecting this non neutral POV (Eidah/Danial and more) is already blocked indefinitely from editing wiki because of his personal attacks on other users, and the article should be opened or at least, that's why i am turning to a Frum Jewish sysop, reverted to the best unbiased version in your eyes. Thanks--יודל 12:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

The article does not appear to be protected anymore. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 12:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks i was fooled by the cosed template. Good Day--יודל 13:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

It will be protected again if you keep reverting without discussing things first. Yossiea 14:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Pinchas only reverted a maintenance think its not warented to place it on the talk page. And Pinchus please check into his contributions if he is not user Eidah/Danial, something is really suspicious, why would he want the article bloked?!--יודל 14:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

I want the article protected because YOU keep on editing without discussing it on the talk page OF THE ARTICLE. Yossiea 14:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

This is a simple lie, and when u wriote in bold u wont win the situation. Everybody can look in the Talk page and see that.--יודל 14:36, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

By all means, look at the talk page. I don't really see you "heavily" using the talk page as you claim.Yossiea 14:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)