| Revision as of 20:49, 4 September 2007 editLucid (talk | contribs)5,964 edits →RE:Bill Prady: you know what, I could explain it, but given you've shown you have absolutely no respect for other editors comments I see no reason to respect yours.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:02, 4 September 2007 edit undoAgüeybaná (talk | contribs)Rollbackers9,714 edits New section: ]Next edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on ]. ] 17:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on ]. ] 17:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == ''Somebody'' needs a ].... == | |||
| was unnecessary. I made a civil suggestion and you uncivilly replied. I have every right to delete comments that do not conform to the ]. Please note that I treat others as they treat me. You responded uncivilly, and I simply removed your comment. Please try to remain civil in the future, and at least try to fix the articles you create. Editors who don't have knowledge of our writing guidelines really shouldn't be reviewing AfC submissions. --''']]]''' 21:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:02, 4 September 2007
Lucidity is a free mind.
| I am offline |
| OSCAR protocol (AIM)- Feba35 |
| MSN IM - therealtaru@hotmail.com |
| Y!M - Febavas@yahoo.com |
| IRC - Usrl@freenode |
| Archives |
| Undated: |
| Unsigned comments
2007: |
Criticism of the BBC - Editing of Misplaced Pages
Although I understand the need to prevent people from including each individual edit in this article, the two that were removed do add weight to the arguments that the BBC is biased against America and appears to want to minimize any negativity against Islam. I've also done a whois on 132.185.240.13 and 132.185.240.120 and they both belong to the BBC (inetnum: 132.185.0.0 - 132.185.255.255; netname: BBC; descr: British Broadcasting Corporation) so please consider re-including those edits. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Devnull82 (talk • contribs) 18:58:56, August 19, 2007 (UTC).
About my Vandalism
Sorry for that. I thought the one before my edit was vandalizing. So I undid it. And I didn't check it. I apologize my fault. Please don't think it is a vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.30.109 (talk) 06:46, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
== MAFIAA
Hey mo, where is the information about fair use and BLP?
My IQ is higher than yours, BTW. xoxoxoxo, -- 67.161.150.171 14:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sure it is. #12 here and #1 here should answer your question --lucid 15:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- That's a filthy, filthy lie. Either cite relevant policies, or put in an RfC, or get off my back. – 67.161.150.171 17:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, you will be blocked from editing. You have been warned multiple times and shown the exact policy that says this. Just because you disagree with it does not give you an excuse to vandalize Misplaced Pages. --lucid 04:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Also, see WP:NPA and WP:CIV, which you have broken multiple times --lucid 04:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Would you cut this out? I have to see "You have new messages" everytime I log on to wikipedia now. All of my edits were/are good faith. You've cited no wikipedia policies to support the "no fair use images in blp" articles. It feels more like you're harassing me than anything else -- which is not only uncivil, but also a personal attack. Can you either put up or shut up? xoxoxoxo -- 67.161.150.171 04:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- That's a filthy, filthy lie. Either cite relevant policies, or put in an RfC, or get off my back. – 67.161.150.171 17:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
The messages thing is a known bug that happens to IP users. Creating an account and logging in will fix it, you might also want to see WP:WHY. It has nothing to do with harassment, I have no control over when that box shows up or doesn't, and a software bug annoying you is not the same as a user harassing you. Anyway, I have shown you the exact policy that deals with this, that you do not like it is not my problem. --lucid 06:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- There is nothing in here or here that forbids fair use images in blp articles. I don't want to login and create an account. Posting threatening warnings on my IP's talk page for an non-existent policy feels pretty harassing to me -- especially after I've asked you to stop. -- 67.161.150.171 13:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
UAA policy
Hi Lucid, I noticed you had warned User:Alasdair about an incorrect WP:UAA report. I don't know if this was in reference to the username containing the word 'pee', but in any case, I've started a thread on the UAA talk page here and your comments would be most welcome. All the best, Eliz81 07:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well in any case, there seems to be some disagreement about UAA and your comments are welcome, regardless of the date of your message. Eliz81 07:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
heyy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.17.176.11 (talk) 23:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Re:
:D It's the guy who lives next door to the third-degree cousin of science's step-mom's highschool sweetheart and never leaves his flat. Ok, I'm doing it injustice, maybe. —AldeBaer 09:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Loholt
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Loholt, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.earlybritishkingdoms.com/bios/loholt.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 17:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Somebody needs a break....
This edit summary was unnecessary. I made a civil suggestion and you uncivilly replied. I have every right to delete comments that do not conform to the talk page guidelines. Please note that I treat others as they treat me. You responded uncivilly, and I simply removed your comment. Please try to remain civil in the future, and at least try to fix the articles you create. Editors who don't have knowledge of our writing guidelines really shouldn't be reviewing AfC submissions. --Boricuæddie 21:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)