| Revision as of 17:20, 5 September 2007 editChristTrekker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,960 edits noting dispute← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:05, 5 September 2007 edit undoSir Joseph (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,854 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom--] 14:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom--] 14:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge''' per ]. However, I am ''not'' surprised to see some of the editors who come out in support of deleting a ] article. ⇔ <span style="font-family: Eurostile, Charcoal, Virtue, Chicago;">]</span> 17:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | *'''Merge''' per ]. However, I am ''not'' surprised to see some of the editors who come out in support of deleting a ] article. ⇔ <span style="font-family: Eurostile, Charcoal, Virtue, Chicago;">]</span> 17:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' as per ] ] <sup><font color="Green">]</font></sup> 19:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:05, 5 September 2007
Hashivenu
Unsourced unnoteable organazation fails WP:ORG. Yeshivish 07:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. —Yeshivish 07:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Yeshivish 07:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep They r indeed very Notable, they are active and they have a following, check on Google search results they appear noted in more then just a few web sites, and thus Notable to include them into a neutral encyclopedia, this deletion was posted to the Jewish portal so that's why u have such an unporportional support for deletion, this vote does not represent the wikipedia community on balance, and i ask the sysops to refrain from acting here just by majority rule.--יודל 12:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete needs more than existence to have an article - and I am not even sure of it exists. Jon513 13:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete falls far short of notability GDonato (talk) 16:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:N and WP:V. -- But|seriously|folks 17:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chesdovi 17:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Merge with its parent organisation, Union of Messianic Jewish Congregations I'm a little surprised none of the others suggested that. The merge seems so obvious that it should have been done outside of AfD. DGG (talk) 00:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Merge per DGG. Not enough evidence to support notability for an independent article. Johnbod 13:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and others. IZAK 13:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Merge - at least provisionally. The organization is prominently mentioned in at least a few independent websites, with whole pages devoted to discussing them. However, the existing articles for both it and its parent are not overly impressive, and at this point they could easily be merged. I would retain the option of dividing the merged article later, should length and additional independent sources and content be added. John Carter 14:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom--Miamite 14:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Merge per DGG. However, I am not surprised to see some of the editors who come out in support of deleting a Messianic Judaism article. ⇔ ChristTrekker 17:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per User:BSF Yossiea 19:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)