Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Hashivenu: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:48, 6 September 2007 editChesdovi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users22,098 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 18:53, 6 September 2007 edit undoIndependentConservative (talk | contribs)23 edits []Next edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
:What?! Nowadays is any conversion to Christianity forced? I hope not – that would be a bad thing. The days of the ] are long gone, and we don’t have Jesus to thank for that. These days, the phoney impostors with their art of persuasion is what we have to watch out for. ] 12:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC) :What?! Nowadays is any conversion to Christianity forced? I hope not – that would be a bad thing. The days of the ] are long gone, and we don’t have Jesus to thank for that. These days, the phoney impostors with their art of persuasion is what we have to watch out for. ] 12:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' into parent organization per DGG. --] 06:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC) *'''Merge''' into parent organization per DGG. --] 06:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The organization has held various forms and has work from various authors. They may be small, but they are real and simply a group of believers in God trying to spread a message of hope.] 18:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:53, 6 September 2007

Hashivenu

Hashivenu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unsourced unnoteable organazation fails WP:ORG. Yeshivish 07:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Why can you create a zillion articles on Synagoges, but yet you jump on one article on a think tank. I see double standard blaring all over the place.Johnpacklambert 04:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I believe that the few synagogue articles I have created are notable. There are ‘’zillion’s’’ of synagogues in Greater London, (where I live), which are not notable and therefore no article exists on each of them. I do not spend all my time sifting through AFD’s and casting votes, but the ones with a Judaism connection and which are listed on the Jewish topic deletion board, I sometimes feel inclined to vote on. There are no double standards here, just paranoia! Chesdovi 12:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:Jew-MJ dispute

  • Merge Probably the only time I don't vote to outright keep an MJ article. Jewish editors take note, hell must have frozen over! Contary to the AfD reasoning, the information in this article is valid, and notable, but I believe it would better fit as a subsection in the UMJC article for now until more detail and notability can be found to warrant an exclusive article apart from the UMJC article. inigmatus 22:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge per DGG and inigmatus. Jamie Guinn 23:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep the organization operates independently of its parent organization. I highly suspect the delete votes, because they all seem to be by people highly invested in articles on Judaism. Messianic Judaism undercuts the lie that most Jewish conversion to Christianity is forced, and so main stream Jews want knowledge of it suppressed. If they had their way there would be no article on Messianic Judaism in wikipedia.Johnpacklambert 04:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
What?! Nowadays is any conversion to Christianity forced? I hope not – that would be a bad thing. The days of the Auto de fe are long gone, and we don’t have Jesus to thank for that. These days, the phoney impostors with their art of persuasion is what we have to watch out for. Chesdovi 12:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Categories: