| Revision as of 08:41, 6 September 2007 editAA (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,256 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 124.148.68.59 identified as vandalism to last revision by TexasAndroid.← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:47, 7 September 2007 edit undoCopy328 (talk | contribs)6 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| I don't usually like to revert another admin's edits, but I've extended the block on {{user|Coastusual}} from your 31 hours to an indefinite one. After reviewing all the user's edits, it was pretty obvious that they are up to no good. I don't think you'll lose sleep over it, but I at least wanted to drop you a line. :) ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 15:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | I don't usually like to revert another admin's edits, but I've extended the block on {{user|Coastusual}} from your 31 hours to an indefinite one. After reviewing all the user's edits, it was pretty obvious that they are up to no good. I don't think you'll lose sleep over it, but I at least wanted to drop you a line. :) ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 15:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| : Yeah. No problem. I was already in my mind debating whether to bother extending it myself. Look through the history on ], and you'll see this is actually the (at least) third account for this joker. ] and ] are pretty obviously the same vandal. We'll see what happens next. - ] 15:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | : Yeah. No problem. I was already in my mind debating whether to bother extending it myself. Look through the history on ], and you'll see this is actually the (at least) third account for this joker. ] and ] are pretty obviously the same vandal. We'll see what happens next. - ] 15:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Why you deleted ] ???? As he is the head of ], that should be enough to make him notable, like the head of the ]. Or is it because you have something against Jews ?? | |||
Revision as of 13:47, 7 September 2007
 Archives |
|---|
Twerp
I marked the old article for watching at the time of the old AFD, and was thus surprised when an article reappeared. I believe the move to the dictionary is the best solution: well done. Peterkingiron 21:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Favorite
I was most surprised to see this prodded. There were several disam meanings listed. One of the main meanings was already more than a dicdef. Do you do this sort of thing often? Johnbod 13:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Umm. Not really sure what you mean by your question. Is my judgement perfect on these? No. That's part of the reason I tend to use the PROD on these rather than Speedy delete them, for which they generally qualify. PROD allows or five days for people to disagree with me, such as you have just done. Just A5 speedying these leaves no such room. After someone disagrees, the next step, if I still think the article is a dictionary definition, is to take it to AFD.
- I'll have to think about the Favorite article. IMHO, multiple dictionary definitions in an article still leaves a dictionary definition article. The mention of historical use is IMHO marginal at best for making it not a dic def. So, as I said, I'll have to think a bit about whether I shall take this to AFD as my next step. - TexasAndroid 13:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
You must be joking. The other meanings are mostly not dicdefs. Mind you, AfD it & we can start again with the proper spelling, so go ahead. Johnbod 13:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
...Why did you delete PKMN Diamond And Pearl?
This is an OUTRAGE!!!
159.83.4.150 19:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- The redirect at Pokémon Diamond and Pearl was requested for deletion by User:Sceptre, presumibly so that he/she could restore the article, currently sitting at Pokémon: Diamond and Pearl (video game), back into place. The article itself was not deleted, just a redirect. - TexasAndroid 19:36, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| Thank you for catching my mistakes in the new article The Texas Aggie. Your quick realization that I meant to create a redirect (and subsequent fix) is much appreciated! Karanacs 20:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC) |
- No problem. And thanks for the barnstar. I regularly run short pages patrol, and one of the very common things encountered on such is broken/malformed/etc redirects. So I fix a lot of them. :) It's nice to have it appreciated though. :) - TexasAndroid 20:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Bryn Mawr redirect accidental blank
Sorry about the Bryn Mawr redirect blank - I had a problem with the computer I was using at work and when I was fineally able to un-blank it, you had caught the error -- I re-edited it the way I origionally meant to -- Thanks, Nicholas SL Smith 21:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Just a head's up
I don't usually like to revert another admin's edits, but I've extended the block on Coastusual (talk · contribs) from your 31 hours to an indefinite one. After reviewing all the user's edits, it was pretty obvious that they are up to no good. I don't think you'll lose sleep over it, but I at least wanted to drop you a line. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah. No problem. I was already in my mind debating whether to bother extending it myself. Look through the history on Jane Tomlinson, and you'll see this is actually the (at least) third account for this joker. User:Mightlaws and User:Onlywent are pretty obviously the same vandal. We'll see what happens next. - TexasAndroid 15:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Why you deleted Ehud Bandel ???? As he is the head of Masorti, that should be enough to make him notable, like the head of the Anglican Church. Or is it because you have something against Jews ??