Misplaced Pages

Talk:Bobbi Eden: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:20, 22 June 2005 editMutterErde (talk | contribs)1,014 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 23:46, 22 June 2005 edit undoMutterErde (talk | contribs)1,014 edits mNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:
I have a 17cm screen , 800 X 600 pixel - all normal standard .i haven´t changed anything and therefore i see a clear design in my version and some unsorted pics in yours. I have a 17cm screen , 800 X 600 pixel - all normal standard .i haven´t changed anything and therefore i see a clear design in my version and some unsorted pics in yours.


2. I think , it´s not a good idea to start your wikipedia-carreer with redesigning.Better you find new facts or start new articles and all will be glad. Look at the red names and let´s talk about redesigning in some years , when all these women have their own article. 2. I think , it´s not a good idea to start your wikipedia-carreer with ''"complete redesignings"''.Better you find new facts or start new articles and all will be glad. Look at the red names and let´s talk about redesigning in some years , when all these women have their own article.


btw: Only for these one-phrase-girls ( + measurements + pic like ] ) that huge - in my opinion too huge - infobox makes any sense. Greetings ] 23:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) btw: Only for these one-phrase-girls ( + measurements + pic) like ] that huge - in my opinion too huge - infobox makes any sense. Greetings ] 23:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:46, 22 June 2005

Design of the Page

I recently redesigned the page using an official Female Actress template, that is used on many pages. User:MutterErde has reverted it. I think that my design is MUCH better!

NewDesign: (By Indication) http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bobbi_Eden&oldid=15202129

OldDesign: (By MutterErde) http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bobbi_Eden&oldid=15308219

The design should be changed back to the NewDesign, so it meets more standards and looks much better. But i first want to get some comments from you! What do you prefer?

Greetings User:Indication

  • Hi ,

1. i guess you have a bigger screen than me or you might have changed your configuration.So you might have a different view than me. I have a 17cm screen , 800 X 600 pixel - all normal standard .i haven´t changed anything and therefore i see a clear design in my version and some unsorted pics in yours.

2. I think , it´s not a good idea to start your wikipedia-carreer with "complete redesignings".Better you find new facts or start new articles and all will be glad. Look at the red names and let´s talk about redesigning in some years , when all these women have their own article.

btw: Only for these one-phrase-girls ( + measurements + pic) like Tiffany_Fallon that huge - in my opinion too huge - infobox makes any sense. Greetings MutterErde 23:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)