| Revision as of 02:01, 23 June 2005 editJRM (talk | contribs)5,015 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 02:06, 23 June 2005 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| No wait with feeling. What is the ''purpose'' of this page, actually? It doesn't say. I suppose it's not to reinforce the clique of adminship by encouraging them to "me, too" the decisions made, and/or delineate the subcliques by encourage "me neither" responses? Because whatever it's supposed to do, I do believe that's what it's going to end up like, sure as ] is doing it now. ] · ] 02:01, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC) | No wait with feeling. What is the ''purpose'' of this page, actually? It doesn't say. I suppose it's not to reinforce the clique of adminship by encouraging them to "me, too" the decisions made, and/or delineate the subcliques by encourage "me neither" responses? Because whatever it's supposed to do, I do believe that's what it's going to end up like, sure as ] is doing it now. ] · ] 02:01, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC) | ||
| :I think this is a good idea, and we should let Ed see whether it works. There are cases of serious policy violations where our hands are almost tied, and they shouldn't be. Noel, perhaps you could edit the page to tighten up that the specific policies have to be named. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 02:06, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:06, 23 June 2005
What, just "policies"? We don't have to specify which ones? Isn't that a little on the convenient side?
No wait. What I meant to say was: this page is redundant with Special:Log/Block and/or Special:Ipblocklist. Isn't it?
No wait with feeling. What is the purpose of this page, actually? It doesn't say. I suppose it's not to reinforce the clique of adminship by encouraging them to "me, too" the decisions made, and/or delineate the subcliques by encourage "me neither" responses? Because whatever it's supposed to do, I do believe that's what it's going to end up like, sure as WP:AN/I is doing it now. JRM · Talk 02:01, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
- I think this is a good idea, and we should let Ed see whether it works. There are cases of serious policy violations where our hands are almost tied, and they shouldn't be. Noel, perhaps you could edit the page to tighten up that the specific policies have to be named. SlimVirgin 02:06, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)