Revision as of 09:29, 9 September 2007 editGrafikbot (talk | contribs)18,549 edits BOT: Novels newsletter delivery← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:05, 9 September 2007 edit undoZekka~enwiki (talk | contribs)28 edits →WE ARE MAKING A LEGAL COMPLAINT ABOUT THE CONSISTENT REVERTING OF OUR EDITS - WOMACK & WOMACK/ZEKKARIYAS FORMERLY CECIL WOMACK /ZERIIYA ZEKKARIYAS FORMERLY LINDA WOMACK: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 289: | Line 289: | ||
<small>This is an automated delivery by ] 09:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)</small> | <small>This is an automated delivery by ] 09:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)</small> | ||
== WE ARE MAKING A LEGAL COMPLAINT ABOUT THE CONSISTENT REVERTING OF OUR EDITS - WOMACK & WOMACK/ZEKKARIYAS FORMERLY CECIL WOMACK /ZERIIYA ZEKKARIYAS FORMERLY LINDA WOMACK == | |||
THIS COMMENT IS PERSONALLY FROM ZEKKARIYAS/CECIL WOMACK & ZERIIYA ZEKKARIYAS/LINDA WOMACK | |||
WE ARE POLITELY REFERRING THE CONTENT OF THE ARTICLES ON YOUR SITE, WITH MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT TRUE, | |||
REGARDING OUR BIO, CURRENT AND PAST. WE THEREFORE, ARRANGED TO HAVE THOSE EDITED. SO THAT THEY WOULD | |||
REFLECT A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OURSELVES WITHIN YOUR SITE. | |||
WE WERE TOLD THAT THIS WAS AN EDITABLE SITE, ALSO THAT IT DOESN'T INFRINGE UPON COPYRIGHT, AND CERTAINLY | |||
NOT UPON A PERSONS PERSONAL COPYRIGHT, THE RIGHT TO HAVE INFORMATION ABOUT THEMSELVES PUBLICALLY DISPLAYED. | |||
WE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE CONTENT AT PRESENT, THAT KEEPS REPLACING THE EDITS OUR ACCOUNT HAS MADE. | |||
WE THEREFORE, REQUEST THAT YOU REVERT TO THE EDITS FROM OUR ACCOUNTS, ASAP. | |||
WE APPRECIATE YOUR COMPLIANCE TO OUR REQUEST. | |||
ZEKKARIYAS & ZERIIYA ZEKKARIYAS |
Revision as of 11:05, 9 September 2007
This is GlassCobra's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
Please post new messages to the bottom of this page, or to the bottom of your previous comments if you've already posted about the same topic. I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise; please respond on mine so that my new message box appears, as I will notice your message sooner. I archive threads when there are 50 on the talk page. If you wish to revisit an archived discussion, please copy and paste all text, formatting included, to the bottom of this page, and type your reply underneath. Thanks.
Archives |
vn-3 | This user talk page has been vandalized 3 times. |
User:Chcfea
I caught and reverted both of his vandalisms on your page. I put him up on AIV right afterwards, so no worries. He'll catch an indef one way or the other. Peace. Bullzeye 20:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've always said a good no-BS way to determine what an editor's made of is how many times their user page has been vandalized. Needless to say, you seem to be pissing off just the right people :) Bullzeye 20:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- No joke, brother. Been there done that...it sucks the Project's such a magnet for the mental midgets of the world. I guess if they weren't here they'd be on Slashdot or Usenet (or throwing rocks at cars outside their house)...oh well, I figure all we can do is make like Jim Morrison: keep our eyes on the road and our hands upon the wheel. Bullzeye 20:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- No prob, boss. Drop me a line if you ever need help with something. Or if you want a nom for WP:RFA. Bullzeye 21:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- No joke, brother. Been there done that...it sucks the Project's such a magnet for the mental midgets of the world. I guess if they weren't here they'd be on Slashdot or Usenet (or throwing rocks at cars outside their house)...oh well, I figure all we can do is make like Jim Morrison: keep our eyes on the road and our hands upon the wheel. Bullzeye 20:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
The End's Not Near, It's Here
Hey, just letting you know that the edits you reverted by 74.117.11.63 were clearly removal of vandalism; it even clearly states "removing vandalism" in the edit summaries. You even warned the person for fighting vandalism. Please take closer looks at the content that you're restoring from now on. Donkey Kong? Come on, man. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 04:27, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- My mistake. I apologized to the anon editor. Owen× ☎ 15:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Pardon me, but I'd like a response to my previous comment, or at least an apology to the anon editor involved. User:OwenX has already apologized. Actually, I find your warning highly ironic: "Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Misplaced Pages without a good reason." I consider fighting vandalism a pretty good reason. As I said before, please be more diligent in reading the content that you are restoring. Even with a cursory glance you would have seen terms like "Donkey Kong" and "Rosie O'Donnell" and known that the content did not belong. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 16:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but, in fairness, your first message didn't actually ask for a reply or even an apology for that matter. Anyway I meant to reply to the message on your talk page and his after I archived it but I got distracted with bigger, real life issues. Here is where I'm asking for forgivness for not getting back to you sooner. Clearly reverting their edit was a huge mistake and I apoligised to anon user for it. I also deleted the warning from his talkpage. Also when I reverted his edit, he didn't actually have an edit summary filled it saying "undoing vandalism" etc as it was blank. It was unexplained thats why I gave anon user that particular warning. But I apoligised now as I was clearly mistaken and everybody is happy and can move on from this experience. AngelOfSadness talk 18:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- It's fine. No need to worry about it. I'll see you around. Happy Editing :D AngelOfSadness talk 19:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to say thanks for the message about my edits. I was wondering why I was getting warnings when it was obviously vandalism and I had stated it the second time around. You didn't need to message them about it but you did, and I really appreciate it so thanks again! :) (74.117.11.63 04:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC))
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Warnings removal by User:Smallers23
Just thought you should know that users are allowed to remove warnings on their talk pages, although archiving is prefered. It is taken to indicate that the warning has been received. Please see WP:TALK#User_talk_pages. Regards, Flyguy649 contribs 05:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thanks for your kind welcome! Actually, I've been knocking around for a while here, under different IPs. So far, I've usually done small fixes, such as spelling errors and the like, while trying to get a good grasp of how things work around here. Anyway, here's something for you:
124.148.93.216 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Have a wiki-wiki day! 124.148.93.216 06:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
What
dont tell me what to do! i like to make stuff bout myself! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshua Erwin (talk • contribs) 07:10, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
manila hotel
will be adding more information please wait thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilbertyl (talk • contribs)
- Hi thanks for fixing up manila hotel I'll help post more articles here if I've stumbled into any noteworthy articles thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilbertyl (talk • contribs) 03:27, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
Redirect of David J silver
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on David J silver, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because David J silver is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting David J silver, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Ill Intelleks Page Deletion
Illintelleks 18:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey GlassCobra
I still don't understand why my article was deleted from the Wiki. It said something about duplicated text on another website but this text appears everywhere as biographical information released from Blindog Records LLC in Vermont, USA. Why can't I recreate the article following the proper guidelines? considering several people feel this is something that should be documented in the wiki. I left out the link to the groups Myspace.com account which the core bot picked up as a red flag and asked me to remove, which I did promptly.
Let me know how I can fix the article following the proper guidelines, rather than just deleting it and telling me I can't make it ever again.
Thanks for your time
-Andrew
Ill Intelleks Management
http://www.illintelleks.com
management@illintelleks.com
Email a User
Should work now if you're still interested. Bullzeye 05:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 35 | 27 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
BUPC
The BUPC has full support for MfD, so we'll finish out the round in my sandbox if you wish to continue, this will be the final round, and I have preserved the archive in my sandbox too as an archive. Notify me if you wish to continue. My sandbox is located at User:Kkrouni/Sandbox--Kkrouni/こかるに/Ккроуни/ΚκρΩυνι 16:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
John bellamy
On August 25th I switched the CSD tag on this article to PROD. A short while later you switched it back with an edit summary of "Are you serious? The MTV is obviously a lie, and there's a karate box for a non-notable form of martial arts. This is obvious CSD." Yes I was serious. A claim to have videos on MTV, even a false claim, is a claim to notability, which is all an article needs to avoid CSD A7. Admins should not evaluate the truthfullness of claims to notability when deciding whether or not to delete via A7. Hoaxes are not speedy candidates. Dsmdgold 15:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Re:Redwall Portal
Hey, the first step is deciding what components you want to include. We can do virtually anything we like here, but most good portals include four content components of one kind or another. You may find it useful to look over some other portals (Portal:Narnia, for example, although there don't seem to be any featured portals on similar topics).
If you'd like, I can put together a rudimentary skeleton and then we can futz with it. Carom 12:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Page deletion
I recently became involved with volunteering at the Aishel House, and thought to publish a page on wikipedia about it. I did not mean to simply promote it, but as of the fact that i am not the best writer around i guess i did a bad job. Is there any way that i can retain the article on my computer for my own personal documentation? as the article is now deleted i dont know what to do. if that type of page does not belong on wikipedia, then i am more than happy if it is deleted. btw i am new to wikipedia and was wondering if there was a more user friendly tutorial available online. thankks peretzlaz — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeretzLaz (talk • contribs)
Perry Publishing and Broadcasting.
The entry for Perry Publishing and Broadcasting is needed as this company owns several radio stations that are entries at Misplaced Pages.
As for links, if you had checked at the bottom of the entry, you would have noted that I've had left links to both the company's site as well as their newspaper. The corporate site has more information about their history as well as their acquistions.
I believe that you had jumped the gun on this issue.
(Robynwatts 14:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC))
Perry Publishing and Broadcasting (part 2)
GlassCobra,
I've included a link to a recent article from "Black News" about Perry Publishing and Broadcasting recent station acquisitions in Augusta, Georgia from Radio One and this has been posted with the Wiki article.
Sorry that there is no other "outside" information online at this time. There was a newspaper article about the purchase of several stations in Oklahoma, but has since been archive. I believe in factual infomation myself, but sometimes it is hard to come by online.
Robynwatts 22:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 36 | 3 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 03:21, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Redwall
Anything in particular you would have me do? --Solar Sunstorm 03:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Xoriat
Remember to warn the article creator. I've done so this time around ;) Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- What're the odds...sorry, I haven't seen you around NPP before...I still should've been a bit more polite about it. In any case, keep up the good work! I've watchlisted the article, so if it is removed, I'll just AfD it. Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's common courtesy to warn users before vanishing. tsk tsk :P Yeah, I remember the name, but it's not every day you see who tagged the article (except when you need to notify them about warnings, which I did today!). Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:18, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Green Arrow's rogues gallery
Virtually every other noteworthy DC Comics hero has an article about their frequent enemies, so why not Green Arrow!? I don't understand your problem with the reference links reverting back to the Green Arrow article itself. That's better than having no substance at all. TMC1982 1:05 a.m., 9 September 2007 (UTC)
So why is this particular one called "rogues gallery" then? If you really insist on keeping it, at least make it consistent with the other lists of enemies. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 08:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
I just moved the article so that it can be titled List of Green Arrow enemies (so that it would be more consistent with the other lists). I beat you to the punch! TMC1982 1:13 a.m., 9 September 2007 (UTC)
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI - September 2007
The September 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 09:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
WE ARE MAKING A LEGAL COMPLAINT ABOUT THE CONSISTENT REVERTING OF OUR EDITS - WOMACK & WOMACK/ZEKKARIYAS FORMERLY CECIL WOMACK /ZERIIYA ZEKKARIYAS FORMERLY LINDA WOMACK
THIS COMMENT IS PERSONALLY FROM ZEKKARIYAS/CECIL WOMACK & ZERIIYA ZEKKARIYAS/LINDA WOMACK
WE ARE POLITELY REFERRING THE CONTENT OF THE ARTICLES ON YOUR SITE, WITH MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT TRUE, REGARDING OUR BIO, CURRENT AND PAST. WE THEREFORE, ARRANGED TO HAVE THOSE EDITED. SO THAT THEY WOULD REFLECT A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OURSELVES WITHIN YOUR SITE. WE WERE TOLD THAT THIS WAS AN EDITABLE SITE, ALSO THAT IT DOESN'T INFRINGE UPON COPYRIGHT, AND CERTAINLY NOT UPON A PERSONS PERSONAL COPYRIGHT, THE RIGHT TO HAVE INFORMATION ABOUT THEMSELVES PUBLICALLY DISPLAYED.
WE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE CONTENT AT PRESENT, THAT KEEPS REPLACING THE EDITS OUR ACCOUNT HAS MADE.
WE THEREFORE, REQUEST THAT YOU REVERT TO THE EDITS FROM OUR ACCOUNTS, ASAP.
WE APPRECIATE YOUR COMPLIANCE TO OUR REQUEST.
ZEKKARIYAS & ZERIIYA ZEKKARIYAS