Revision as of 13:55, 9 September 2007 editWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:05, 9 September 2007 edit undoWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits further commentNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
--] 17:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | --] 17:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
:That's ] without a citation. Extending a rule from one instance to another is a leap of logic, which is OR. ] 13:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | :That's ] without a citation. Extending a rule from one instance to another is a leap of logic, which is OR. I've checked three on-line dictionaries and two paper dictionaries, including my copy of the compact ]. ] 13:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:05, 9 September 2007
Re Xian, no citation is necessary. It's common knowledge.
The X in Xian is like the X in Xmas. If "xmas" = "christmas", then "xian" = "christian".
--63.166.226.83 17:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- That's original research without a citation. Extending a rule from one instance to another is a leap of logic, which is OR. I've checked three on-line dictionaries and two paper dictionaries, including my copy of the compact Oxford English Dictionary. WLU 13:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)