| Revision as of 00:02, 23 June 2005 editMutterErde (talk | contribs)1,014 edits →Design of the Page: m← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:53, 23 June 2005 edit undoGrenavitar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,686 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| btw: only for these one-phrase-girls ( + measurements + pic) like ] (:kiss:) that huge - in my opinion too huge - infobox might make any sense. Greetings ] 23:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) | btw: only for these one-phrase-girls ( + measurements + pic) like ] (:kiss:) that huge - in my opinion too huge - infobox might make any sense. Greetings ] 23:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ::Uhh, his redesign made it more coherent... and not just an amalgam of porn pictures (it gave purpose to the full frontal thing)... Although, it's a bad idea that her main picture is nude.... errh or maybe that's her identity ~_~... I think a box like they have for presidents is fine and you should make his that size if you think it was too large. ] 01:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:53, 23 June 2005
Design of the Page
I recently redesigned the page using an official Female Actress template, that is used on many pages. User:MutterErde has reverted it. I think that my design is MUCH better!
NewDesign: (By Indication) http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bobbi_Eden&oldid=15202129
OldDesign: (By MutterErde) http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bobbi_Eden&oldid=15308219
The design should be changed back to the NewDesign, so it meets more standards and looks much better. But i first want to get some comments from you! What do you prefer?
Greetings User:Indication
- Hi ,
1. i guess you have a bigger screen than me or you might have changed your configuration.So you might have a different view than me. I have a 17' screen , 800 X 600 pixel - all normal standard .i haven´t changed anything and therefore i see a clear design in my version and some unsorted pics in yours.
2. I think , it´s not a good idea to start your wikipedia-carreer with "complete redesignings".Better you find new facts or start new articles and all will be glad. Look at the red names and let´s talk about redesigning in some years , when all these women have their own article.
btw: only for these one-phrase-girls ( + measurements + pic) like Tiffany_Fallon (:kiss:) that huge - in my opinion too huge - infobox might make any sense. Greetings MutterErde 23:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Uhh, his redesign made it more coherent... and not just an amalgam of porn pictures (it gave purpose to the full frontal thing)... Although, it's a bad idea that her main picture is nude.... errh or maybe that's her identity ~_~... I think a box like they have for presidents is fine and you should make his that size if you think it was too large. gren 01:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)