Misplaced Pages

Guns, Germs, and Steel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:14, 4 July 2002 editThe Epopt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,330 edits actual complete sentences and even some links! whatta concept← Previous edit Revision as of 21:08, 5 July 2002 edit undoSlrubenstein (talk | contribs)30,655 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<b><cite>Guns, Germs, and Steel</cite></b> is a ]-winning book by ] arguing that the power and technology gaps dividing human societies developed not from cultural or racial differences but from differences in geography and resources. <b><cite>Guns, Germs, and Steel</cite></b> is a ]-winning book by ] arguing that the power and technology gaps dividing human societies developed not from cultural or racial differences but from differences in geography and resources.


This book has been criticized as an example of environmental determinism with racist implications -- not because it claims superiority of Europeans, but because it overlooks or obscures the importance of non-European knowledge and technologies (as well as labor) in European development. This book has been criticized as an example of environmental determinism with racist implications -- not because it claims superiority of Europeans, but because it overlooks or obscures the importance of non-European knowledge and technologies (as well as labor) in European development see, ''inter alia'', the geographer James M. Blaut's ''Eight Eurocentric Historians'').

Revision as of 21:08, 5 July 2002

Guns, Germs, and Steel is a Pulitzer Prize-winning book by Jared Diamond arguing that the power and technology gaps dividing human societies developed not from cultural or racial differences but from differences in geography and resources.

This book has been criticized as an example of environmental determinism with racist implications -- not because it claims superiority of Europeans, but because it overlooks or obscures the importance of non-European knowledge and technologies (as well as labor) in European development see, inter alia, the geographer James M. Blaut's Eight Eurocentric Historians).