| Revision as of 02:14, 25 June 2005 editTheresa knott (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,922 edits →Personal attacks← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:19, 25 June 2005 edit undoHelicoid (talk | contribs)181 edits →Personal attacksNext edit → | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| :::::::::Don't take me for an idiot, Ms. Knott. I'm not one. Are you then suggesting that you too know enough of the subject-matter to judge what has become of my entry an IMPROVEMENT? Let's be clear here, where the encyclopedic mission of Misplaced Pages and the responsibility of its administrators is in public view and AT STAKE. And once again the "anarchist" got it wrong. | :::::::::Don't take me for an idiot, Ms. Knott. I'm not one. Are you then suggesting that you too know enough of the subject-matter to judge what has become of my entry an IMPROVEMENT? Let's be clear here, where the encyclopedic mission of Misplaced Pages and the responsibility of its administrators is in public view and AT STAKE. And once again the "anarchist" got it wrong. | ||
| ::::::::::I know a reasonable amount of physics yes. I know that the aim of the editors is to improve the article. You may well disagree that the article has in fact been improved after a particluar edit, but that doesn't give you the right to accuse people of vandalising the article. ] ] 02:14, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ::::::::::I know a reasonable amount of physics yes. I know that the aim of the editors is to improve the article. You may well disagree that the article has in fact been improved after a particluar edit, but that doesn't give you the right to accuse people of vandalising the article. ] ] 02:14, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::::::I assume then you're familiar with Aetherometry and its predecessors. Should I assume that it is you who's orchestrating this rotten concerto? You see, if you compare what I did with what your people did, it is night and day, and I doubt any group of intelligent people would refuse to see the difference. Right now, I'm fighting against an abortion of my careful work. An abortion that does not reflect even the facts - such that I'm being prevented of reporting that the Correas drew inspiration from F. Nietzsche and N. telsa, and wrote about them, and others wrote about what they wrote about them. See my point. You are responsible for this clownery, so it seems to me. Ie IMHO since I have no power and no authority than that of facts and the truth to the best of my abilities. | |||
Revision as of 02:19, 25 June 2005
Warning
Pjacobi 20:46, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
Oh, stop editing other people's comments. You've done the same to me as well. And for personal attacks, I never did call you anything, so mind yours too. I bet my nationality is very relevant in this case. *rolleyes* -- Natalinasmpf 21:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Stop deleting my responses. Retract all the lies you have stated. Be civil, and I will be civil. Lie and make more false statements and I will continue to take you to task. It is part of your education. You will not forget it.Helicoid
- Firstly, stop making erratic personal attacks either, and changing other people's comments. Unfortunately, you infused such changes with your own comments, so the revert cancalled it out. As for retracting my stance, how childish. You want to continue to commit what can be considered vandalism, simply because you can't stand my opinion? How ironic, this reminds me of the Inquisition. Part of my education? Take me to task? I'm about to put you up for RFC. -- Natalinasmpf 00:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- No, the Inquisition is you, Mr. fake anarchist and fake-adolescent. You have vandalized everything I did, and more, vandalized gratuitously the reputation of the Correas and many other scientists in the process. I'm putting Ms. Knott on notice that I will now send a complete copy of these transcripts to the Correas and others. A retraction of these fake claims by irresponsible Wikipedians and a restoration of my entry to a suitable middle term (not this abortion) is in order.
2nd warning
You did it again:
This is a blockable offense. --Pjacobi 23:45, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
He just did it a third time. I reverted. -- Natalinasmpf 00:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Did what again? Correct a mispelling in your text or interact with your statements?
As it would be against policy to block him myself, I've reported at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Aetherometry. --Pjacobi 00:38, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
- Thank you for finally seeing the problem, but signing your post at the very top of the talk page with the usual ~~~~ would be even more clear. --Pjacobi 00:44, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
- Even though I corrected it myself and you saw that, you're willing to report me. Nice. Thank you. Will I be arrested? That's the point of the exercise in coercion isn't it? Very democratic.Helicoid.
- What? Your actions are violating other people's freedoms, namely for a constructive NPOV encylopedia. Coercion? Irony. As for "reporting", its only concerning this site, not a law. Oh, Misplaced Pages isn't a government, either, so stop complaining. -- Natalinasmpf 02:02, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Personal attacks
Personal attacks and breaking the three revert rule are blockable offenses. Your edits to Aetherometry amount to personal attacks. Please remove them. Guettarda 01:21, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- What edits? Helicoid
- "Detractors of aetherometry who have not read the material state..." - you are attacking your fellow editors. Please remove these attacks. Guettarda 01:34, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- That's not a personal attack as far as I can see. Having said that, it's silly to have it in the article as no one can say who has read what Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 01:38, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I guess that you guys have now blocked me from history and editing the entry. Good show all around. Power - that's all that counts.
- The page isn't locked, and if you can edit this page you aren't blocked. Guettarda 01:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell you aren't blocked at all and are perfectly free to edit. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 01:49, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Good, Ms. Knott. And what's with the headings? not a block? by the way, have you noticed how the detractors of my free contribution have NOT read the material? Is it Misplaced Pages policy to assert dogmas about science and give the deciding power to those who vandalized my contribution to this pitiable extent? Helicoid.
- You are not blocked from editing the headings. If you explain the problems you are having I can perhaps sort it out for you. As for people editing the page, I haven't seen any vadalism. People are trying to improve the article as far as I can see. It's important that it is fair and neutral and reports both sides of the argument. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 01:58, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I think he refers to his frustration of not being able to edit the headings concerning other people's comments. He thinks its an "abuse of power". Great, and this from a person calling me a "false anarchist". -- Natalinasmpf 02:00, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Don't take me for an idiot, Ms. Knott. I'm not one. Are you then suggesting that you too know enough of the subject-matter to judge what has become of my entry an IMPROVEMENT? Let's be clear here, where the encyclopedic mission of Misplaced Pages and the responsibility of its administrators is in public view and AT STAKE. And once again the "anarchist" got it wrong.
- I know a reasonable amount of physics yes. I know that the aim of the editors is to improve the article. You may well disagree that the article has in fact been improved after a particluar edit, but that doesn't give you the right to accuse people of vandalising the article. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 02:14, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I assume then you're familiar with Aetherometry and its predecessors. Should I assume that it is you who's orchestrating this rotten concerto? You see, if you compare what I did with what your people did, it is night and day, and I doubt any group of intelligent people would refuse to see the difference. Right now, I'm fighting against an abortion of my careful work. An abortion that does not reflect even the facts - such that I'm being prevented of reporting that the Correas drew inspiration from F. Nietzsche and N. telsa, and wrote about them, and others wrote about what they wrote about them. See my point. You are responsible for this clownery, so it seems to me. Ie IMHO since I have no power and no authority than that of facts and the truth to the best of my abilities.
- I know a reasonable amount of physics yes. I know that the aim of the editors is to improve the article. You may well disagree that the article has in fact been improved after a particluar edit, but that doesn't give you the right to accuse people of vandalising the article. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 02:14, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Don't take me for an idiot, Ms. Knott. I'm not one. Are you then suggesting that you too know enough of the subject-matter to judge what has become of my entry an IMPROVEMENT? Let's be clear here, where the encyclopedic mission of Misplaced Pages and the responsibility of its administrators is in public view and AT STAKE. And once again the "anarchist" got it wrong.