Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:00, 25 June 2005

Purge the cache to refresh this page

• ]

Each week, Wikipedians nominate two articles to become the collaborations of the week. The aim is to produce featured-standard articles, through widespread cooperative editing. This project aims to fill holes in Misplaced Pages, so only non-existent articles, or stubs may be nominated.

Please note: this is a trial period with two articles per week, instead of just one. For the old one-per-week collaboration, see Collaboration of the week.

Though this project is inactive, you can help with : Lee Costello (random unreferenced BLP of the day for 4 Jan 2025 - provided by User:AnomieBOT/RandomPage via WP:RANDUNREF).

The next two collaborations will be selected at 18:00 on Sunday June 26, UTC (the current time is 03:35, January 5, 2025).

• Previous collaborations may be found at past collaborations.
• Failed nominations may be found at failed nominations.

Selection process

The collaborations are selected by approval voting. This is done by clicking the edit button to the right of the article's nomination, and adding the text # ~~~~.

• Only registered users may vote, and their first edit must have been before the article was nominated.
• Only support votes and comments should be added, as the articles are chosen by approval voting.

The two articles chosen are the two articles with the most votes, of broadly different categories (such as Ancient Greece and the weather). This is intended to give a diverse range of people contributing to the articles and prevent dividing contributors' knowledge between two similar articles.

Nominating articles

To nominate an article:

• At the bottom of the list of nominees on this page enter the text {{Misplaced Pages:Collaborations of the Week/article name}}, replacing the text "article name" appropriately.
• Follow the new red link, and enter the text {{subst:newcotw|article name|~~~~~|date in seven days|your reason for nominating|~~~~}}. changing the text accordingly (for example, add: {{subst:newcotw|Dog hair|~~~~~|]|This is really important for all dog-lovers.|~~~~}}).
• If the article you are nominating already exists, please add {{cotw}} to the top of its talk page.

Considerations

• Please only nominate stubs (articles of two short paragraphs or less).
• Giving good reasons will help others in supporting your nomination.
• Articles should interest a wide number of people, so many can contribute to the article's improvement.

Nominees

History of Greece (June 28)

Nominated May 24 2005; needs 25 votes by June 28 2005

Support:

1. Dmcdevit 18:45, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
2. ZeWrestler 20:58, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
3. Falphin 22:48, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
4. Jpbrenna 05:23, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
5. RexNL 10:23, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
6. Junes 20:19, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
7. Newbie222 18:40, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
8. Neutrality 06:15, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
9. Fenice 06:38, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
10. User:Rdsmith4/Sig 19:09, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
11. Jacoplane 17:31, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
12. Zxcvbnm 13:58, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
13. EatAlbertaBeef 15:10, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
14. The Anachronism 17:13, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
15. Milena 17:42, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
16. Volatile 23:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
17. brian0918™ 23:24, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
18. Bruno 03:08 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
19. gren 06:11, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
20. T. K. Leibniz the Ineffable 20:22, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
21. McCart42 (talk) 03:44, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
22. Magicmonster 05:46, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
23. Jelloyeti 08:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• I happen to know that COTW regulars must be ancient Greco-Roman experts by now. I just stumbled upon this article and was surprised to find a stub. It seems silly to me to have such a great series that the {{History of Greece}} is, with such a stubbish introductory general article. --Dmcdevit 18:45, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• Three cheers for history articles. User:Rdsmith4/Sig 19:09, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Well, I don't know if I can help with this article, but I think it deserves being a Collaboration of the Week! :-D --Milena 17:42, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
• If this article became COTW, would it be an overview of the entire history of Greece (which I imagine it would be) and link to the specific time periods, or would it cover a certain time period? I could probably only help if it were an overview. If it is, I'll cast a vote for it. Mred64 16:26, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

• It's definitely an overview. --Dmcdevit 04:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• I think this should be done because it's in more need of attention than the current Egyptian nomination which is beating this. gren 06:11, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ancient Egypt (June 28)

Nominated May 24 2005; needs 25 votes by June 28 2005

Support:

1. Revolución 19:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
2. ZeWrestler 20:59, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
3. Carolaman 01:09, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
4. Lightamplification 02:59, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
5. RexNL 10:21, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
6. Falphin 18:24, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
7. Junes 20:14, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
8. SimonP 04:23, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
9. Mihoshi 00:34, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
10. Tothebarricades.tk 06:59, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
11. Stancel 01:19, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
12. kaal 19:11, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
13. Fenice 06:39, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
14. Pjamescowie 05:39, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
15. Superm401 | Talk 02:07, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
16. Jacoplane 17:32, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
17. olivier 03:29, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
18. Mark Lewis 22:11, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
19. brian0918™ 02:43, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
20. Howabout1 Talk to me! 15:58, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
21. Talrias (t | e | c) 17:52, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Nomination for same reasons as Ancient Rome, this is just a collection of links. It would be nice to have a good overview article, also keeping with the ancient civilisations trend here on COTW. ;-) Revolución 19:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• The age of Ancient Egypt never ceases to amaze me. Cleopatra's life and death is closer to us than the building of the pyramids!

Mihoshi 00:34, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

• Definitely needs an overview article. --Tothebarricades.tk 06:59, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
• This article has done rather well since its initial nomination. Phoenix2 18:42, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

History of Scandinavia (July 16)

Nominated June 4 2005;Needs 30 votes by July 16, 2005

Support

1. SimonP 17:31, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
2. Falphin 17:58, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. Wiglaf 18:51, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. Fenice 22:55, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. Dhartung00:09, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Jeltz talk 16:34, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
7. Fornadan (t) 09:14, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
8. Valentinian 22:17, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
9. Mike H 00:11, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
10. NatusRoma 01:06, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
11. -mrbartjens 16:29, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
12. Sqkvii 06:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
13. — Sverdrup 16:29, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
14. Ombudsman 07:23, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
15. gren 15:36, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
16. Thue | talk 23:03, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
17. P0ppe 11:44, 22 Jun 2005 (GMT+2)
18. Maitch 23:36, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
19. Palnatoke 05:59, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
20. Malene 07:32, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
21. Blueroan3 16:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
22. Olve 17:01, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
23. Imperialles 17:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
24. BjarteSorensen 21:34, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
25. Jon Harald Søby 14:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
26. Rentastrawberry 16:47, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
27. Heelgrasper 17:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
28. Jetro 10:33, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments

• I'm surprised this doesn't exist yet. The history of the Scandinavian countries are so deeply intertwined that it is important to have a page looking at them as a group. We have a lot of articles touching on this area, but no one page that ties them all together. - SimonP 17:31, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
  • I tried Scandinavian history and it just redirects to Scandinavia. It is another topic that needs to be selected as a COTW.
  • I made it a redirect like Scandinvian history and then added a COTW message about it on the talk page so it will be more noticable that it is a candidate. Falphin 18:48, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I must say I don't much like this practice. To me nothing illustrates the need for a page more than a red link. It also doesn't much help readers who are expecting to find an article on the subject rather than a redirect to a related page . - SimonP 19:58, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
      • After nomination many articles get fleshed out. The voting is determined by contributor interest, and not need per se, from my experience; it has little do with a red link. --Dhartung | Talk 00:09, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Personally I prefer the redirect, but thats a matter of preference. Falphin 18:31, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I'm even surprised there wasn't a History subhead in the Scandinavia article (only that table). On the other hand, individual countries have reasonably complete history articles: History of Norway, History of Sweden, History of Denmark. --Dhartung | Talk 00:09, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• No Scandinavian literature either, which is a request from the Britannica 2004 matching project. lots of issues | leave me a message 02:20, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I helped you out and deleted that redirect. Revolución 04:28, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• This article may provide some difficulty in that the definition of Scandinavia is not universally agreed on. Conrad Leviston 14:02, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I agree I would consider Scandinavia Norway, Sweden and Finland, though Denmark could be also considered. Greater Scandinavia could include Iceland, The Netherlands, the North and East Frisian areas of Germany and the Kola Peninsula. Sqkvii 06:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Scandinavia is clearly defined and includes Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Finland, the Netherlands, Russia and Northern Germany has nothing with Scandinavia to do!! However, Scandinavians share some of their history with bordering areas, and many countries were colonized by Scandinavians. This does however not make Britain part of Scandinavia, just like America is not part of the British Islands.
  • IMHO, I believe Scandinavian history would include, Norway,Sweden,Finland,Denmark,Faroes,Greenland,and Iceland for the entire article. While during ceartain periods, the Baltic countries, Normandy, Rus, and England would be included. Falphin 17:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • The article should include all of these variants. --brian0918™ 17:20, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • IMHO, the best way to go is to stick to the Scandinavian definition of Scandinavia and focus on the history of Sweden, Norway and Denmark. The remainder (Iceland, Finland, Greenland, etc.) will follow naturally.--Wiglaf 22:00, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Since Iceland, Finland, and the Baltic Republics have all been ruled by Scandinavian states at one time or another, sticking to a strict definition will be impossible. As I've noted there are decent articles on individual nations; this article needs only to be an overview, so I don't think there's any point in going narrow. It's going to have a bunch of Main article: notes as it is. --Dhartung | Talk 16:29, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

That is why a joint history of Sweden, Norway and Denmark will include those regions. They will follow naturally.--Wiglaf 08:50, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

For the record: The Scandinavian countries are Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. The two latter being the countries of the Scandinavian peninsula. The Nordic countries are Denmark (including the Faroe Islands and Greenland), Norway, Sweden, Finland (including the "Åland islands"), and Iceland. The Baltic countries Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are not included in any of these groups. I agree with User:Falphin, if Northern Germany is included in his list of extensions.Sir48 - User profile in English

Agree with Sir48. --Malene 07:32, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Culture of Iraq (June 28)

Nominated June 7 2005; Needs 15 votes by June 28, 2005

Support:

1. Falphin 01:49, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Revolución 02:00, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. NatusRoma 20:35, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. Fenice 10:55, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. Pharos 02:32, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Howabout1 Talk to me! 16:06, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
7. 500LL 19:10, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
8. —thames 19:39, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
9. Dhartung | Talk 06:39, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
10. Columbia 11:40, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
11. gren 06:13, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
12. Darwinek 09:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• This is an important topic with little on it. Its currnetly the number one hit on google and therfore should be expanded. Falphin 01:49, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• This definitely needs to be expanded. Revolución 02:00, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• My God, is it POV right now. --Dhartung | Talk 06:39, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes, infact, nothing against the contributers, I think we should start from scratch if this became the COTW. Falphin 16:35, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Iraq is culture...Cradle of Civilization... this article should not be so small :O gren 06:16, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I think this needs editing because, with the US war, it would be a popular page.

Space Age (June 29)

Nominated June 8 2005;Needs 15 votes by June 29, 2005

Support:

1. Falphin 17:14, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Mike H 18:23, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
3. TheFountainhead 03:36, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. lots of issues | leave me a message 06:54, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) Good find! No matter what the vote lets work on it now.
5. Phoenix2 23:06, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Fenice 08:56, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
7. Youngamerican 19:57, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
8. Pharos 23:21, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) Despite my comments below, I've come to the conclusion that the Space Age is important as a cultural concept.
9. R Lee E 03:53, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
10. Trevor macinnis 22:44, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
11. The Kohninater 04:22, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
12. Caeonosphere 13:28, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Three sentences is the entire article. Falphin 17:14, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• With a lot of hard work, there is enough information for this to become a featured article. Phoenix2 23:06, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Actually, it's hard to think of exactly what could go into a featured-quality long-length article under "Space Age". Perhaps you mean Space Race; otherwise the general topic is Space exploration. I don't know what else "Space Age" could cover other than its temporal denifition (which it does now and is therefore necessarily quite short), or maybe the effect of space exploration on culture (which is itself an interesting topic).--Pharos 02:44, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • OK, but there is still enough for it to be much better than it is now. Phoenix2 19:39, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • But expanded in what vein? This should not just duplicate other articles on space exploration. The "effect on culture" angle is the only one I can think of that might allow this to develop to a decent, non-trivial, non-redundant article. What do you think?--Pharos 20:13, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Yes, it seems as if this article can only be expanded to a certain extent. Phoenix2 16:41, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • The more I think about it, the more I see how this is important as a cultural concept. From Googie in architecture to the Blue Marble in the environmental movement, space exploration has left a real impression on the Earth.--Pharos 23:21, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Racism in the United States (July 4)

Nominated June 13 2005; Needs 15 votes by July 4 2005

Support

1. Falphin 01:14, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Mike H 01:35, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
3. Howabout1 Talk to me! 15:57, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
4. kralahome 02:40, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
5. Dhartung | Talk 06:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Ombudsman 07:42, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
7. KNewman 11:13, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
8. --ZeWrestler 11:41, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
9. Mihoshi 18:13, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
10. Darwinek 09:33, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• An extremely important topic, IMHO that after surviving vfd is in desperate need of attention. Falphin 01:14, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Try seeing if you can branch this article to History of the Southern United States. Mike H 01:35, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
    • This article is listed for deletion. Why is it nominated then? And why only Southern United States? Will there be an article on Racism in the Northern United States? KNewman 13:00, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
      • The South has had more of an established cultural identity than the North. Mike H 14:19, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
      • Racism in the Northern United States isn't nearly as established as Racism in the Southern United States. Perhaps eventually an article could aslo be made on the North but nearly all famous racist incidents, events, organizations etc are in the South. 12.220.47.145 00:04, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I would much rather begin with Racism in the United States (and why isn't there a Racism section under Human rights in the United States?. It is also incorrect and stereotypical to assume that racism in the North is less important or encyclopedic; it often had a different character. For example the New York Draft Riots involved the lynching of several African-Americans and stemmed from unemployment and job competition issues as much as anything; Chicago is infamously the most segregated city in the country; and no one can say that racism has had little to do with the decline of Detroit. So there's plenty to say on this topic, South and North.--Dhartung | Talk 22:11, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Agreed 100% --brian0918™ 22:34, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Alright, I would then support to change this title to Racism in the United States as long as MikeH and Howabout1 agree. Falphin 22:56, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Ya, that would be fine. Howabout1 Talk to me! 23:00, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
      • Sure. Mike H 02:03, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Excellent! In that case I join in support. I'm intrigued how this will go. --Dhartung | Talk 06:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• One of the top level sections, beneath the obvious ones like Jim Crow law and Compulsory sterilization, has to be Eugenics, which is said to have had its epicenter in Virginia. Ombudsman 07:42, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I wasn't going to support this at first, but now that you've changed the title, i'll be more than happy to lend a hand. --ZeWrestler 11:41, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Independence (June 27)

Nominated June 13 2005; Needs 10 votes by June 27 2005

Support

1. Beland 06:31, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. ZeWrestler 18:06, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. 500LL 18:08, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
4. --Wonderfool t(c)e) 14:28, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. --Zxcvbnm 17:08, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Revolución 06:04, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• This article is one of the most wanted stubs, linked to from hundreds of others. -- Beland 06:31, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • This was recently on COTW voting but it didn't get one vote. Falphin 15:09, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Well now it has 3 votes. There is so much that can be written with this topic, and a wide range of users should be able to contribute to it. --ZeWrestler 00:20, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • I don't doubt that but it just seemed people weren't interested in interested in it. Thats apparently changed with the increase in traffic here. Falphin 00:41, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

History of painting (June 27)

Nominated June 13 2005; Needs 10 votes by June 27 2005

Support:

1. Falphin 20:53, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Fenice 05:46, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. olivier 09:11, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
4. brian0918™ 21:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. — Sverdrup 16:31, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Darwinek 09:37, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
7. --GregLoutsenko 12:46, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Very little on this page, I believe it would be an easy COTW. Falphin 20:53, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Very important article which can link many topics together and be very usefull for general public--GregLoutsenko 14:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

History of art (June 27)

Nominated June 13 2005; Needs 10 votes by June 27 2005

Support:

1. Falphin 20:56, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. brian0918™ 21:41, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. Fenice 05:47, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. olivier 09:11, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
5. gren 06:08, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Darwinek 09:36, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
7. Eixo 01:28, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• The info is already on subpages just needs its own. Falphin 20:56, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Southeast Asia (July 13)

Nominated June 15 2005; Needs 20 votes by July 13 2005

Support:

1. Pharos 02:10, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Falphin 02:21, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. Mike H 03:17, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) (I'm for this. I'm surprised such a big swath of region, from Myanmar to the Philippines, has no main article).
4. SimonP 03:36, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC), it would be great if History of Southeast Asia also got some attention
5. ℬastique▼ 04:09, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) Sure, why not...
6. Dmcdevit 05:23, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
7. Fenice 08:01, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
8. —thames 19:36, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
9. Conrad Leviston 14:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
10. NatusRoma 06:00, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
11. Volatile 23:01, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
12. CrossTimer 16:09, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
13. gren 06:06, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
14. Darwinek 09:35, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
15. McCart42 (talk) 03:51, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
16. Jelloyeti 12:59, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
17. Dvyost 07:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• A stub for a major world region of 550 million people? What a shame! We had some success with Central Asia in March, even generatiing a couple of substantial sub-articles.--Pharos 02:10, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Its about time a geography article got attention. Falphin 02:21, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Its more than just geography of course; it's also history, culture, politics and economy, everything to do with this huge slice of the world otherwise not dealt with on Misplaced Pages in an integrated manner.--Pharos 03:00, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• This neglect of geographical regions appears to be systemic. A quick search reveals Central Africa, South Asia, Indian subcontinent, Southern Africa, and even Western regions, like Western Europe, Benelux, Great Lakes region (North America) in stubbish condition. --Dmcdevit 05:23, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Sadly their are several more on the list of important geo areas, Latin America,Central America, Southern Europe, North East Africa(doesn't even exist), and the Baltic region along with many more.Falphin 17:31, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• The best collaborations seem to be ones like this where most of the information is already on wikipedia and users just have to transfer it to this page. gren 06:06, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

United States Bicentennial (June 29)

Nominated June 15, 2005; Needs 10 votes by June 29, 2005

Support:

1. ℬastique▼ 15:07, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Mike H 15:55, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
3. Columbia 13:21, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
4. Newbie222 23:15, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. slambo 13:43, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
6. Volatile 23:03, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• This, of course is a particularly US-Centric article. I was surprised that there had not even been a stub created. 1976 was a major event in its own right, as important as Y2K to those of us in the US. As well as quite memorable to those of us who lived through it (although myself I was only 9 years old). There were innumerable celebrations around the nation, and it contributed to other things, for instance, the celebration and gatherings in New York City are often cited as the initial source of the spread of AIDS in the United States. It is often used in literature and news articles. ℬastique▼ 15:07, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • This means that a lot of countries on this planet with a considerably long history will need the same kind of article. Doesn't look encyclopedic at all, but that's just me. Let's hear it from other Wikipedians. KNewman 15:53, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
    • It's not an issue of "did this country pass 200 years" but "did this country pass 200 years with grand parties pretty much everywhere"? Don't we have articles on the jubilees in Britain? Mike H 16:01, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
      • Funnily enough, there WEREN'T any specific jubilee articles. I started to rectify this by writing Silver Jubilee of Elizabeth II. Mike H 03:52, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
• The celebration leading up to the US bicentennial were some of the largest in my country's history. I'd be willing to vote for this. Mike H 16:01, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
• I just found out there's a stub on United States Bicentennial. ℬastique▼ 18:10, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Part of the celebration that is often overlooked by those who are not railfans was that of American railroads. Many of the largest railroads in the country painted some of their equipment in special bicentennial paint schemes (such as this Santa Fe Railroad locomotive). Trains magazine had an article about this recently, I'll see if I can dig it out of my archives again... slambo 13:40, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

Basque Country (June 29)

Nominated June 15, 2005; Needs 10 votes by June 29, 2005

Support:

1. Revolución 19:30, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. —thames 19:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. Falphin 21:18, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. Newbie222 23:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. Fenice 18:15, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Mike H 18:01, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
7. Darwinek 09:30, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

Reproduction (July 6)

Nominated June 15 2005; Needs 15 votes by July 6 2005

Support:

1. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. ZeWrestler 20:34, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. --Zxcvbnm 17:08, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. Pharos 17:15, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) This is a serious omission in our science coverage.
5. --sars 12:55, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
6. Sean Curtin 01:28, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
7. NSR 13:44, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
8. Phoenix2 23:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
9. Mike H 03:51, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
10. Imperialles 00:10, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• I am shocked that such an important topic would have so little information. All living things must reproduce to survive. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• This is a very interesting topic idea. Would be fun to research and contribute to. --ZeWrestler 20:34, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Mechanised agriculture (June 30)

Nominated June 16, 2005; Needs 10 votes by June 30, 2005

Support:

1. Grunners 16:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Pharos 04:51, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) A very important topic in the real world; agriculture is generally underrepresented on Misplaced Pages.
3. Spikeballs 02:36, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
4. Fenice 18:17, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. Mike H 18:00, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
6. Sentience 04:03, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Could do with at least a short article, and something different from the normal COTW nominations Grunners 16:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Good topic. Spikeballs 02:36, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
• See also factory farming--Sentience 04:03, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Quest (July 1)

Nominated June 17, 2005; Needs 10 votes by July 1, 2005

Support:

1. Falphin 02:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Fenice 18:18, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. ZeWrestler 01:29, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. Niz 00:06, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. Newbie222 01:39, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Imperialles 00:10, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• A very stubby article, it could use info on famous quests, fictional ones, and failures.(I also just want to have a Q on this list. Falphin 02:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Too vague if we try to discuss it outside of the literary term. As it stands a few paragraphs or so could probably be added. --Tothebarricades 03:53, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
• I think this could make into a great artical with many sub articals. We have to work on it though in order for it to become Featured artical material. --ZeWrestler 01:29, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I also think that this article would be to vague and would not be a good article for COTW. Phoenix2 23:52, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I don't think this is a good nomination, because "quest" has little meaning outside of fiction. Revolución 06:01, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Fathers Day (June 25)

Nominated June 18, 2005;Needs 5 votes by June 25, 2005

Support:

1. Falphin 21:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Niz 00:06, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• I believe that this could really be expanded. The History is entirely about the U.S. and fathersdays tradition etc are not there. Falphin 21:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Execution (legal) (June 27)

Nominated June 20, 2005;Needs 5 votes by June 27, 2005

Support:

1. Darwinek 16:46, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Falphin 22:34, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. ZeWrestler 11:47, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. Evil Monkey∴Hello 06:10, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
5. Mike H (Talking is hot) 19:00, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• It's too short. - Darwinek 16:46, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I'm amazed that this artical has no meat to it.
• I'm strongly leaning toward making this a merge with Capital punishment. The latter could use some cleanup but it's no stub. --Dhartung | Talk 16:40, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I agree, Dartung, the two things are essentially synonyms. ---Mihoshi 18:17, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I also agree, except that the proper topic of that article is the bit under 'Civil law' at the bottom.--Pharos 18:22, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Isn't this the same thing as "capital punishment"? then, shouldn't this just be a redirect? Revolución 06:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Human embryo (June 27)

Nominated June 20, 2005; Needs 5 votes by June 27, 2005

Support:

1. KNewman 04:12, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
2. Falphin 13:35, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Current Embryo article has just two paragraphs about animals. The Human and Childbirth articles have references to early stages of human development, but I believe this to be an extremely important topic. Honestly speaking, I know nothing about this, so I won't be able to contibute :). Please, remove this nomination, if I overlooked some other article that deals with this topic in detail. KNewman 04:12, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
  • The Embryo article itself should probably be nominated. Falphin 13:35, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I agree. Embryo is a very short stub. More worthy topic, and you could include information about the human embryo in the article. Revolución 05:59, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Embryo topic has now been nominated further below. — RJH 21:05, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

World Heritage Site (July 5)

Nominated June 21, 2005; Needs 10 votes by July 5, 2005

Support:

1. Falphin 13:43, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. 500LL 21:06, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
3. Stbalbach 01:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. Darwinek 09:30, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. Mike H 16:15, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• An article that has its own category but only has a couple paragraphs to describe it. Falphin 13:43, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I think each of the sites probably deserves its own quality article, but it's not clear to me that this article -- essentially describing a formal political designation -- really needs much more than it has. Something pretty much can't get on that list against the wishes of the host country and without having already been designated a park of some kind. --Dhartung | Talk 21:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I believe it would be useful to how a site is nominated, the founding of it, recent news, and perhaps an overview of the first couple selected ones. Falphin 21:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wendy's (2 votes in 1 week)

Nominated on June 21, 2005 (UTC) needs 5 votes by June 28.

This chain is a very important part of world culture. It has a major influence on the current world events with its inventive menu. This article is far too short and rambling.

Support:

1. kralahome 20:01, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
2. Newbie222 01:47, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• Important part of world culture, hmmm... KNewman 21:55, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
• I disagree, this is not a "important part of world culture". Revolución 22:04, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I also disagree. I'll have to get a more persuasive argument than that to expand it. Mike H 15:36, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
• If someone could tell me what Wendy's has to do with world culture, I still wouldn't vote for it. Phoenix2 23:50, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• It doesn't "have a major influence on the current world events with its inventive menu" either. Name one current world event that was influenced by Wendy's "inventive" menu. Revolución 05:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• By being the first to introduce healthy items ons its menu it led all the other fast food chains to introduce healthy items, just changing the face of fast food chains. These items are helping fight back the obsitity epidemic. kralahome 5:19, 23 June 2005
• The importance of Wendy's was shown during the presidential campaign, when unfamiliarity with the all-American menu's favorites such as the chili cup doomed Teresa Heinz Kerry's candidacy for First Lady. Frankly, there hasn't been any coverage of this incident either; it deserves its own article. --Dhartung | Talk 21:18, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Where's the beef? Mike H 04:15, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
  • I agree with Mike.--Fenice 08:13, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I wasn't trying to make a real point...just a way to cite a kitschy '80s catch phrase. Mike H (Talking is hot) 00:16, Jun 27, 2005 (UTC)
      • Oh really?--Fenice 05:10, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I've not heard of this fast food chain much at all. If it was so important, I would of. The only world-notable fast food chains are KFC, McDonalds and Burger King. The rest don't run across the world. Hedley 29 June 2005 23:20 (UTC)

Human physiology (5 votes in 2 weeks)

Nominated on June 22; needs 10 votes by July 6.

Needs expanding

Support:

1. Newbie222 01:47, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Fenice 08:15, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. NatusRoma 22:26, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. PhatRita 29 June 2005 22:44 (UTC)
5. lots of issues | leave me a message 30 June 2005 03:16 (UTC)

Midtown (Manhattan) (2 votes in 1 week)

Nominated on 17:52, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC); needs 5 votes by 29 June 2005.

It's really too short.

Support:

1. P3Pp3r 17:52, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Fenice 08:17, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Cradle of Civilization (2 votes in 1 week)

Nominated on 19:04, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC); needs 5 votes by 29 June 2005.

A common term and wouldn't be difficult to expand

Support:

1. Falphin 19:04, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. ZeWrestler 19:29, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• A common term, yes, but what exactly is this article supposed to be about? Civilization originated independently in a number of places, not just Mesopotamia. Maybe this should just redirect to the Civilization article, where the origins of civilization as well as the earliest civilization are discussed.--Pharos 21:02, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I believe it should include sections on history and usage of the term. Also, I believe it needs an overview of areas known as "Cradles of Civilization." Finally, it needs a Popular cultural section on it. I don't believe it should be redirected. Falphin 00:24, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Havana (6 votes in 2 weeks)

Nominated on 23:10, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC); needs 10 votes by July 6, 2005.

It needs a lot of expansion, not ready for AID.

Support:

1. Falphin 23:10, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Revolución 23:25, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. NatusRoma 04:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. ℬ'que ▼ 18:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. Juppiter 16:46, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Fenice 08:18, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• I agree. Revolución 23:35, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Geology of the Moon (7 votes in 2 weeks)

Nominated on 23:24, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC); needs 10 votes by 7 July 2005.

This is a really important topic.

Support:

1. Revolución 23:24, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Evil Monkey∴Hello 06:10, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
3. Rentastrawberry 03:02, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
4. Jon Harald Søby 14:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. RJH 18:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Milena July 5, 2005 11:07 (UTC)
7. 500LL July 6, 2005 11:38 (UTC)

Comments:

• Could you stub it so those considering can judge the subject?

lots of issues | leave me a message 06:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• • Anyone here have a big library. This list my be useful. Falphin 21:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

A red link in the heading would have been a lot better than what is on Geology of the Moon now. No article is better than something like that. Jon Harald Søby 14:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. Blank articles are frustrating to users expecting info, unnecessary, inflate the count, and shouldn't exist! If anyone has a confident grasp of this subject - please stub it.

lots of issues | leave me a message 17:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I thought an article had to be so many words before it was counted as an article. Falphin 29 June 2005 20:33 (UTC)

• There is also the option of translating this from the featured article on the spanish Misplaced Pages es:Geología de la Luna. If this nomination fails, it can be nominated on WP:SPATRA.--Fenice 08:21, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I found some articles on some lunar rocks in English wikipedia, such as Regolith, Norite, Dacite, Basalt, Gabbro. Not all of the articles on rocks have references to the Moon. KNewman July 1, 2005 11:44 (UTC)

Polynesia (July 14)

Nominated on 23:28, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC); needs 15 votes by 14 July.

Support:

1. Revolución 23:28, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Dmcdevit 23:44, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. Falphin 23:57, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. Pharos 19:24, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. Conrad Leviston 02:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Fenice 08:39, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
7. lots of issues | leave me a message 29 June 2005 07:18 (UTC) Folks just vote for this - if we get all of these large region articles done with we can finally move on to fun stuff.
8. gren 1 July 2005 04:11 (UTC)]
9. Juppiter 1 July 2005 15:44 (UTC)
10. tijmz 5 July 2005 22:52 (UTC)
11. Elefuntboy 8 July 2005 03:25 (UTC)
12. Aecis 9 July 2005 12:19 (UTC)
13. Darwinek 10:12, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• I originally was going to nominate this article but after seing how other geography articles have been doing I withheld my nomination. While I'm still supporting it I would rather see articles like Western Europe on nomintion first. Falphin 23:57, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Hmm... Now that you mention it... --Dmcdevit 00:10, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Interesting I wasn't there then otherwise I would of voted for it. It wouldn't be a bad idea to renominate it to see what happens. Falphin 00:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I too might have nominated a more populous region first, but Polynesia is much larger geographically than Western Europe or most anywhere else. Any cultural region that spans the world's greatest ocean is surely worthy of support.--Pharos 19:24, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Age of Sail (3 votes in 1 week)

Nominated on 00:01, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC); needs 5 votes by June 30.

It's an incredibly important concept in history, and we see references to it frequently in modernity. Compare with Age of Exploration. This stub is pretty embarassing.

Support:

1. Dmcdevit 00:01, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Falphin 01:15, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. Fenice 08:26, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

• I'm not sure how this article would do. Navy has only done so-so because it is a fairly difficult topic. I don't see how Age of Sail could be anything but more difficult. I may still support but I'm going to wait to see other responses to the nomination. Falphin 00:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I believe this is more of a history-related article, and so any real naval knowledge isn't too necessary. --Dmcdevit 00:13, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • What exactly would the article include? Falphin 00:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • It's a multi-century period in history, just like the High Middle Ages. I guess that's a good model. --Dmcdevit 22:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
        • So the article isn't just the name for a historical period but also cultural. And do you think the other two periods should be nominated as well. (Early and Late Middle Ages?). Falphin 01:15, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
          • You know, I had thought it was strange to see the only one of the three with its own article the one that was nominated. If you're considering it, I'd definitely support late, not so sure about early (don't know too much). --Dmcdevit 02:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Embryo(5 votes in 2 weeks)

Nominated on 21:03, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC); needs 10 votes by July 7.

Article suggested as a CotW during discussion of Human embryo nomination. A rather important topic with little content.

Support:

1. RJH 21:03, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Revolución 21:07, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. Imperialles 00:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. KNewman 05:40, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
5. PhatRita 29 June 2005 22:47 (UTC)

There really isn't that much to say about an embryo, I suggest that the focues should be on Embryogenesis--nixie 03:58, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Indo-Pakistani Wars(6 votes in 2 weeks)

Nominated on 21:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC); needs 10 votes by July 7.

See this discussion, . Its an important topic with significant sub-pages

Support:

1. Falphin 21:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. IncMan 22:13, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
3. Fenice 21:09, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. gren 1 July 2005 04:10 (UTC)
5. Marqus 1 July 2005 05:39 (UTC)
6. Gamemasterv 2 July 2005 20:03 (UTC)

Comment:

• There is a very active Indian Collaboration of the Week WP:INCOTW. Maybe we should let the experts tackle that one.--Fenice 08:28, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Indo-Pakistani Wars was nominated for India COTW. Please see this discussion . Thanks --IncMan 12:25, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

I guess I should of made the point of link above more clear. Sorry. Falphin 02:27, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Collaborations of the Week/History of the Bomb

Drum (7 votes in 2 weeks)

Nominated on 18:03, June 24, 2005 (UTC); needs 10 votes by July 8, 2005.

One of the most important musical instruments in the history of humanity....gets only a couple paragraphs.

Support:

1. Revolución 18:03, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Rentastrawberry 21:10, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
3. Falphin 21:17, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. Maitch 20:58, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. File:PhoenixSuns 100.pngPhoenix2File:Teamflag1.png 21:36, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Fenice 08:32, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
7. kralahome 20:06, 1 July 2005 (UTC)
8. Superm401 | Talk July 2, 2005 16:57 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages collaborations