| Revision as of 15:10, 13 September 2007 editJdblick (talk | contribs)40 edits ←Created page with 'The Bill of Rights have rights that are guaranteed, but there are limitations. The Supreme Court of the United States has used a test of [[compelling state int...' | Revision as of 01:10, 17 September 2007 edit undoAlaibot (talk | contribs)434,501 editsm Robot: tagging uncategorised pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| City of Boerne, 1997 | City of Boerne, 1997 | ||
| O Centro v Gonzalez, 2006 | O Centro v Gonzalez, 2006 | ||
| {{Uncategorized|date=September 2007}} | |||
Revision as of 01:10, 17 September 2007
The Bill of Rights have rights that are guaranteed, but there are limitations. The Supreme Court of the United States has used a test of compelling state interest as a standard to limit those rights. This test at least applies to the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. It also applies to abortion, child pornography, discrimination remedies, drug testing, expression and speech rights, liberty (privacy), mandatory retirement, racial discrimination, residency requirements, and sex discrimination. (Epstein, Constitutional Law for a Changing America, 6th)
Some notable cases: Sherbert, 1963 Yoder, 1972 Smith, 1990 City of Boerne, 1997 O Centro v Gonzalez, 2006
 | This redirect has not been added to any content categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar redirects. (September 2007) |