Revision as of 01:22, 3 July 2007 editJ 1982 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users153,033 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 00:30, 24 September 2007 edit undo83.209.100.50 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → |
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
|
:Yes the article have a rather biazed positive spin as if Dansband was a good thing when it really is the devil incarnated. :D --] 14:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC) |
|
:Yes the article have a rather biazed positive spin as if Dansband was a good thing when it really is the devil incarnated. :D --] 14:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC) |
|
:::The articles shall follow a "Neutral point of view", not an "Anti-dansband point of view". For some people, dansband music is the ultimate music. / ] 03:21, 3 July 2007 (CEST) |
|
:::The articles shall follow a "Neutral point of view", not an "Anti-dansband point of view". For some people, dansband music is the ultimate music. / ] 03:21, 3 July 2007 (CEST) |
|
|
::::Well, contemporary dance band is nothing like silly, just pointless. Late 70-mid 80 dance band on the other hand.. then we're talking sillyness.. |