| Revision as of 06:04, 4 September 2007 editAnyeverybody (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,541 edits ==Scientology Definition== This is an interesting article, good job :)← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:47, 29 September 2007 edit undoS. M. Sullivan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,621 edits commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| This is an interesting article, good job :) ] 06:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | This is an interesting article, good job :) ] 06:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Article for deletion== | |||
| If anyone is interested the article ] is slated for deletion. Please read the article and vote on whether to keep it if you are so inclined.] 19:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:47, 29 September 2007
Scientology and the Supreme Being
What sentences did you think needed more sources? If the unsourced second paragraph bothers you, just yank it out. There's a paragraph somewhere in "What is Scientology?" that talks about meditation being frowned upon. wikipediatrix 19:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Wiki my man! Too much to say in such a little time. For example the section about past lives starts with:
"Much of the controversy surrounding Scientology is a consequence of the doctrine of the immortal spirit in combination with the acceptance of past lives."
- My point that that is someone POV. Many religions accept past lives and the immortal spirit so I felt that is very opinionated that someone said that they felt is controversial. Sections felt more like opinions with out citation than encyclopedic data. I will work on it when I get some time I just wanted to warm people about the pit falls in this section. Bravehartbear 18:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
AndroidCAT used this shortcuts not me. However, IADS is shortcut for this wich is believed to be a frontgroup of Scientology (regististered in Clearwater etc.) FASE seems to be explained here
your question
I don't want to question your beliefs but have a problem that it looks like scientificly proven in an encyclopedia. If we write about real affects of a program in WP we must consider reliable sources. Personally I believe that too much niacin causes Flushing wich stops after some weeks when the body gets used to it and the swimsuit shape(I have heard from that too) is explainable thought more possibities. But if you have other spiritual experiences with it I can't and don't want to disprove it. Why should I try to disprove the existence of god or buddha either, it impossible for me. And if you look in the article God you will see any "scientific" study that he really exist too.(: To show the believed good affects of narconon is not problematic for me but it must be cited as such in WP unless reliable sources are there. -- Stan talk 07:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
AndroidCAT used this shortcuts not me. However, IADS is shortcut for this wich is believed to be a frontgroup of Scientology (regististered in Clearwater etc.) FASE seems to be explained here -- Stan talk 07:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! I was pretty sure that IADS was a subdivion of Narconon or Able. I'm sure we all know that. I will make sure that link makes it to the article. It was not my intencion to hide that. I just didn't to whom this org belongs too. Bravehartbear
Scientology Definition
This is an interesting article, good job :) Anynobody 06:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Article for deletion
If anyone is interested the article Psychiatric abuse is slated for deletion. Please read the article and vote on whether to keep it if you are so inclined.S. M. Sullivan 19:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)