| Revision as of 01:44, 29 September 2007 view sourceNexxt 1 (talk | contribs)211 editsm added internal links← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:58, 29 September 2007 view source Devout (talk | contribs)49 edits Complete blanking of a page, and replacement with a biased term, violates Misplaced Pages termsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Hinduism small}} | {{Hinduism small}} | ||
| '''Brahmanical See''' refers to the domain of certain ] leaders in the ]. Because it is essentially an ] term (compare ]), this nomenclature has begun to fall into disuse. | |||
| '''Brahmanical See''' is a term used by neo-Buddhists and other anti-Hindus to name former Hindu kingdoms. | |||
| Much like the former Indian principalities, which varied in scale from small estates to vast kingdoms, the brahmanical sees range from minor parishes to quasi-states. | |||
| ==See also== | |||
| *] | |||
| With Hinduism itself lacking any central organizing institutions, it is common for brahmanical sees to geographically overlap with one another, just as the sees of different Christian denominations can coexist within a shared geography. | |||
| *] | |||
| A religious leader over a Brahmanical See is typically known as a ], or in European terms, a ]. The office is generally passed down the generations in the male line within an extended family, though not necessarily from father to son. | |||
| Again, similar to the tensions which existed in medieval Europe between the ] and the ], tensions between the brahmanical maharajs and the royal ]s constantly were an issue throughout much of the history of ]. The brahmanical maharajs could bestow or withhold the legitimacy without which royal maharajas could not reign, and the royal maharajas could extend or withdraw the military protection without which brahmanical maharajs might not survive. | |||
| The longest established brahmanical sees are the Brahmanical See of ] (which contains a large number of kingdoms), the Brahmanical See of ] (whose borders are coterminal with those of the Kingdom of Mysore), and the Brahmanical See of ] (which is one of several sees contained within the Kingdom of ]). | |||
| With the dissolution of the old kingdoms and the coming of modernity, the importance of the brahmanical sees declined sharply in the last quarter century. The see of Rajasthan is now held by an Indo-Canadian, the see of Mysore is disputed by three claimants, and the see of Dabra has been allowed to lapse entirely. | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 22:58, 29 September 2007
Brahmanical See refers to the domain of certain Hindu leaders in the Indian subcontinent. Because it is essentially an Anglicized term (compare episcopal see), this nomenclature has begun to fall into disuse.
Much like the former Indian principalities, which varied in scale from small estates to vast kingdoms, the brahmanical sees range from minor parishes to quasi-states.
With Hinduism itself lacking any central organizing institutions, it is common for brahmanical sees to geographically overlap with one another, just as the sees of different Christian denominations can coexist within a shared geography.
A religious leader over a Brahmanical See is typically known as a maharaj, or in European terms, a prince of the faith. The office is generally passed down the generations in the male line within an extended family, though not necessarily from father to son.
Again, similar to the tensions which existed in medieval Europe between the papacy and the aristocracy, tensions between the brahmanical maharajs and the royal maharajas constantly were an issue throughout much of the history of India. The brahmanical maharajs could bestow or withhold the legitimacy without which royal maharajas could not reign, and the royal maharajas could extend or withdraw the military protection without which brahmanical maharajs might not survive.
The longest established brahmanical sees are the Brahmanical See of Rajasthan (which contains a large number of kingdoms), the Brahmanical See of Mysore (whose borders are coterminal with those of the Kingdom of Mysore), and the Brahmanical See of Dabra (which is one of several sees contained within the Kingdom of Gwalior).
With the dissolution of the old kingdoms and the coming of modernity, the importance of the brahmanical sees declined sharply in the last quarter century. The see of Rajasthan is now held by an Indo-Canadian, the see of Mysore is disputed by three claimants, and the see of Dabra has been allowed to lapse entirely.
Category: