| Revision as of 09:59, 1 November 2003 editAngela (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users45,368 editsm rm my comment as page had now moved← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:39, 19 April 2005 edit undo213.84.212.97 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| If I am not mistaken, the popes listed were all North African and therefore not what is normally known as "black", which usually refers to the race of sub-Saharan Africans. ] 05:55, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC) | If I am not mistaken, the popes listed were all North African and therefore not what is normally known as "black", which usually refers to the race of sub-Saharan Africans. ] 05:55, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC) | ||
| The first edit by Warlockgruffles (18:23, 19 Apr 2005) adds a particularly non-neutral POV. --] 21:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:39, 19 April 2005
- As pagan culture faded, so did the chance of another African pope.
Huh? Pagan culture was somehow an antidote against racism, or Christianity was/is somehow inherintly racist, or both? -- Khym Chanur 04:09, Nov 1, 2003 (UTC)
If I am not mistaken, the popes listed were all North African and therefore not what is normally known as "black", which usually refers to the race of sub-Saharan Africans. Maximus Rex 05:55, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC)
The first edit by Warlockgruffles (18:23, 19 Apr 2005) adds a particularly non-neutral POV. --213.84.212.97 21:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)