Misplaced Pages

:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 October 4: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Templates for deletion | Log Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:04, 4 October 2007 editNug (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,427 editsm Template:Soviet occupation← Previous edit Revision as of 06:04, 4 October 2007 edit undoDojarca (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,831 edits Template:Soviet occupationNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:
==== ] ==== ==== ] ====
:{{lt|Soviet occupation}} :{{lt|Soviet occupation}}
This is an inherently POV template created by a POV pusher and long-term vandal ] (see block log: ) who also created (and attempted to re-create under other names) already deleted articles ] and ]. The template attempts to integrate very different events. For example, the ongoing Russian-Japanese territorial dispute over Kuril islands is counted as "occupation". Another link redirects to ]. Please note that the topic is havily occupied by a number of related accounts, based in Estonia (see ], ]). Alternatively the template may be moved to ] with heavy rework. — ] 02:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC) This is an inherently POV template created by a user with the long history of disruption ] (see block log: ) who also created (and attempted to re-create under other names) already deleted articles ] and ]. The template attempts to integrate very different events. For example, the ongoing Russian-Japanese territorial dispute over Kuril islands is counted as "occupation". Another link redirects to ]. Please note that the topic is havily occupied by a number of related accounts, based in Estonia (see ], ]). Alternatively the template may be moved to ] with heavy rework. — ] 02:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


*'''Keep'''. I don't think Misplaced Pages should ignore the concensus for the term "Soviet occupation" in the scholarly literature because a handful of anonymous Russian ultra nationalist editors disagree. There are 5360 hits in google scholar for the term "Soviet occupation" and only 107 hits in google scholar for the term "Soviet liberation" ] 06:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. I don't think Misplaced Pages should ignore the concensus for the term "Soviet occupation" in the scholarly literature because a handful of anonymous Russian ultra nationalist editors disagree. There are 5360 hits in google scholar for the term "Soviet occupation" and only 107 hits in google scholar for the term "Soviet liberation" ] 06:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:04, 4 October 2007

< October 3 October 5 >

October 4

Template:Infobox Cities in Senegal

Template:Infobox Cities in Senegal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete. Only used on a few pages and it had many empty fields. It was standardized to {{Infobox Settlement}}. MJCdetroit 02:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Template:Soviet occupation

Template:Soviet occupation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is an inherently POV template created by a user with the long history of disruption Digwuren (see block log: ) who also created (and attempted to re-create under other names) already deleted articles Denial of Soviet occupation and Estophobia. The template attempts to integrate very different events. For example, the ongoing Russian-Japanese territorial dispute over Kuril islands is counted as "occupation". Another link redirects to History of Poland (1945–1989). Please note that the topic is havily occupied by a number of related accounts, based in Estonia (see Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Digwuren, Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/DLX). Alternatively the template may be moved to Template:Soviet zones of occupation with heavy rework. — Dojarca 02:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep. I don't think Misplaced Pages should ignore the concensus for the term "Soviet occupation" in the scholarly literature because a handful of anonymous Russian ultra nationalist editors disagree. There are 5360 hits in google scholar for the term "Soviet occupation" and only 107 hits in google scholar for the term "Soviet liberation" Martintg 06:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)