Revision as of 20:59, 5 October 2007 editJoshuaZ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,657 edits →TrueOrigin Archive: clarify← Previous edit |
Revision as of 21:52, 5 October 2007 edit undoJinxmchue (talk | contribs)1,677 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → |
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
|
*'''Keep''' Great reference for silly ] arguments. It is notable, probably not as well-done as AnswersinGenesis, but it's a great location to find rebuttals to TalkOrigins. However, the article itself is poorly written, external links are kind of a repeat of itself, and it needs to somewhat resemble ], which discusses that website better. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 20:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
*'''Keep''' Great reference for silly ] arguments. It is notable, probably not as well-done as AnswersinGenesis, but it's a great location to find rebuttals to TalkOrigins. However, the article itself is poorly written, external links are kind of a repeat of itself, and it needs to somewhat resemble ], which discusses that website better. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 20:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
*'''delete''' This isn't notable. The "counterpart" the ] has multiple, independent ] that discuss it. The TrueOrigin Archive does not. It massively fails ]. If someone can find reliable sources that talk about it I will consider changing my position. ] 20:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
*'''delete''' This isn't notable. The "counterpart" the ] has multiple, independent ] that discuss it. The TrueOrigin Archive does not. It massively fails ]. If someone can find reliable sources that talk about it I will consider changing my position. ] 20:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Keep''' Seems as notable as Talk Origins. In fact, Talk Origins links to and has responses to True Origins. ] 21:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC) |