Revision as of 22:40, 7 October 2007 editKirill Lokshin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users75,365 edits →Proposed temporary injunctions: Trim← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:41, 7 October 2007 edit undoKirill Lokshin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users75,365 edits →Motions and requests by the parties: TrimNext edit → | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
===Template=== | ===Template=== | ||
2) | |||
<!-- uncomment and un-nowiki when motion passes <nowiki> | |||
'''Passed''' on ~~~~~ | |||
</nowiki> --> | |||
{text of proposed motion} | |||
:Support: | |||
:# | |||
:Oppose: | |||
:# | |||
:Abstain: | |||
:# | |||
===Template=== | |||
1) | |||
<!-- uncomment and un-nowiki when motion passes <nowiki> | <!-- uncomment and un-nowiki when motion passes <nowiki> | ||
'''Passed''' on ~~~~~ | '''Passed''' on ~~~~~ |
Revision as of 22:41, 7 October 2007
After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other Arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop, Arbitrators may place proposals which are ready for voting here. Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain. Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed. Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed. Only Arbitrators or Clerks should edit this page; non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
For this case, there are 9 active Arbitrators, so 5 votes are a majority.
Motions and requests by the parties
Place those on /Workshop. Motions which are accepted for consideration and which require a vote will be placed here by the Arbitrators for voting.
Motions have the same majority for passage as the final decision.
Scope
1) Passed on 17:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
This matter concerns all disruptive editing related to Estonian-Russian ethnic conflict, particularly those who edited regarding the Bronze Soldier of Tallinn controversy. Any editor reasonably believed to have engaged in disruptive editing may be noticed in and evidence may be presented regarding them. If evidence is presented regarding an editor, they should be noticed in.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Template
2) {text of proposed motion}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Proposed temporary injunctions
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
Template
1) {text of proposed orders}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Proposed final decision
Proposed principles
Misplaced Pages is not a battleground
1) Misplaced Pages is a reference work. Use of the site for political or ideological struggle accompanied by harassment of opponents is extremely disruptive.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Courtesy
2) Misplaced Pages users are expected to behave reasonably and calmly in their dealings with other users. Insulting and intimidating other users harms the community by creating a hostile environment. Personal attacks are not acceptable.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Consensus
3) Misplaced Pages works by building consensus through the use of polite discussion. The dispute resolution process is designed to assist consensus-building when normal talk page communication has not worked. Sustained edit-warring is not an appropriate method of resolving disputes, and is wasteful of resources and destructive to morale.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Keeping one's cool
4) Editors are expected to keep their cool when editing. Uncivil behavior by others should not be returned in kind. Casual allegations of poor wikiquette are considered harmful; such concerns should be brought up in appropriate forums, if at all.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
At wit's end
5) In cases where all reasonable attempts to control the spread of disruption arising from long-term disputes have failed, the Committee may be forced to adopt seemingly draconian measures as a last resort for preventing further damage to the encyclopedia.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Template
6) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Proposed findings of fact
Locus of dispute
1) The current dispute revolves around various topics in Estonian history—particulary post-World War II history—and is essentially a part of the broader long-term disputes prevalent over the entire range of articles dealing with Eastern European history.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Alexia Death
2) Alexia Death (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has engaged in a variety of disruptive behavior, including sustained edit-warring (, , , , , , , , , ) as well as incivility, personal attacks, and assumptions of bad faith (, ).
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Digwuren
3) Digwuren (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has engaged in a variety of disruptive behavior, including sustained edit-warring (, , , , , , , , , , ) and attempts to interfere with Misplaced Pages process (, , ), as well as incivility, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith, and repeated attempts to use Misplaced Pages as a battleground (, , , , , , , ).
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Irpen and Piotrus
4) Irpen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Piotrus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) have a long history of personal disputes. Their interaction since Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus has continued to be confrontational.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Irpen
5) Irpen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has frequently engaged in personal attacks, incivility, and assumptions of bad faith (, , , , , , ).
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Petri Krohn
6) Petri Krohn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has engaged in a variety of disruptive behavior, including sustained edit-warring (, , , , , , , , , , , ) as well as incivility, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith, and repeated attempts to use Misplaced Pages as a battleground (, , , , , ).
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
RJ_CG
7) RJ_CG (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has engaged in sustained edit-warring (, , , , , ) as well as incivility, personal attacks, and assumptions of bad faith ().
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Suva
8) Suva (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has engaged in incivility, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith, and repeated attempts to use Misplaced Pages as a battleground (, , , ).
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Template
9) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Alexia Death restricted
1) Alexia Death (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is subject to an editing restriction for one year. He is limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. Should he exceed this limit or fail to discuss a content reversion, or make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Digwuren banned
2) Digwuren (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned from Misplaced Pages for a period of one year.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Irpen restricted
3) Irpen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is subject to an editing restriction indefinitely. He shall not interact with or comment in any way (directly or indirectly) about Piotrus on any page in Misplaced Pages. Should he do so, or make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Petri Krohn banned
4) Petri Krohn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned from Misplaced Pages for a period of one year.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Piotrus restricted
5) Piotrus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is subject to an editing restriction indefinitely. He shall not interact with or comment in any way (directly or indirectly) about Irpen on any page in Misplaced Pages. Should he do so, he may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
RJ_CG restricted
6) RJ_CG (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is subject to an editing restriction for one year. He is limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. Should he exceed this limit or fail to discuss a content reversion, or make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Suva banned
7) Suva (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned from Misplaced Pages for a period of one year.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Editors warned
8) All editors are warned that future attempts to use Misplaced Pages as a battleground—in particular, by making generalized accusations that persons of a particular national or ethnic group are engaged in Holocaust denial or harbor Nazi sympathies—may result in the imposition of summary bans when the matter is reported to the Committee. This applies both to the parties to this case as well as to any other editor that may choose to engage in such conduct.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Template
9) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Proposed enforcement
Enforcement by block
1) Should any user subject to an editing restriction in this case violate that restriction, they may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated violations. After 5 blocks, the maximum block shall increase to one month. All blocks are to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren#Log of blocks and bans.
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Discussion by Arbitrators
General
Motion to close
Implementation notes
Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.
Vote
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.