Revision as of 23:20, 3 October 2007 editJreferee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,390 edits Added new thjread← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:24, 9 October 2007 edit undoShadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 3 sections to User talk:Tawker/Oct07Next edit → | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Thanks, Michael Durr | Thanks, Michael Durr | ||
mdurr@worldbank.org <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:14:08, August 22, 2007 (UTC)| 14:08, August 22, 2007 (UTC)}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | mdurr@worldbank.org <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:14:08, August 22, 2007 (UTC)| 14:08, August 22, 2007 (UTC)}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
== HotSoupProcessor == | |||
hi! | |||
do you still have the content about HotSoupProcessor you deleted? how can we undelete it? HSP were an important part of hobbyst japanese computer coding history, which is important for the ocidental culture who used to not knowing this awesome programming language interpreter - see also http://ja.wikipedia.org/HotSoupProcessor (you can see translated somehow from http://babelfish.altavista.com) | |||
thanks! :-) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== speedy delete - crapware == | |||
Can I ask why you speedied ] when it was up for an AfD? Without having seen the article, I'm not sure I understand its eligibility. I'm perfectly willing to believe that it was delete-worthy, but being as this is actually a term that is in pretty wide-spread usage, why did it not stand for its AfD? - ] 19:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Ronald A. Carson== | |||
An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you deleted and/or restored this article at one point in time, you might want to participate in the deletion review if you have not already done so. -- ]]/] 23:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:24, 9 October 2007
Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages when the above gets sorted out |
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives
Removal of template acknowledging source of imported material
Please see Template talk:EnPW. I see that a dozen or more pages had that acknowledgment removed "per Danny". A violation of license, on the face of it. Robin Patterson 18 Feb 2007
Master Nan
I assume you are the one who deleted the article on Master Nan. I can't understand why you did that as the sources were cited and corrections were made to avoid copyright infringement. Moreover, at the time the only tag on the article was for the article to be cleaned up. All I did was try to reiterate some facts on a famous buddhist scholar and all the work put into it has been deleted in a flash and without warning. I cannot claim to be tech savvy enough to know whether you are directly responsible, but if so, it makes unfamiliar and new contributors like myself have a strong sense of distaste that there is not even the chance for correction. What's the point of trying to establish an article if it keeps on getting deleted before it's done. If you could please give specific reasons why it was deleted as the article was rewritten to avoid copyright infringement. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Studydoc (talk • contribs) 14:18, Mar 14, 2007 (UTC).
Cadiz Record
Why deleted? regards densbtly
Deletion of Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency Page
Hi,
I noticed you apparently deleted the "Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency" (MIGA). How come? Is there a copyright infringement (I'm guessing that's what "copyvio" means)?
I should point out I work for MIGA.
Thanks, Michael Durr mdurr@worldbank.org —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mikedurr (talk • contribs) 14:08, August 22, 2007 (UTC).