| Revision as of 08:12, 9 October 2007 editVictor falk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,988 edits :*A community development 3-page glossy brochure is hardly a ''reliable'' proof of ''notable'' economic impact, is it?--~~~~← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:15, 9 October 2007 edit undoFourthords (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,005 edits →Sierra Vista Mall: + input;Next edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| *'''Keep''', passes WP:N with a great deal of press coverage of the topic throughout its history. , even the cinema opening ] 03:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', passes WP:N with a great deal of press coverage of the topic throughout its history. , even the cinema opening ] 03:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| **If this is going be deleted as "spam" we can just make a new version anyway. ] 03:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC) | **If this is going be deleted as "spam" we can just make a new version anyway. ] 03:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' as ]. — ''']''' <sup>|''' ]'''</sup> | 08:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:15, 9 October 2007
Sierra Vista Mall
- Sierra Vista Mall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable mall in California. A search turns up no reliable sources to verify most of the page's content. Borderline spam. Ten Pound Hammer • 17:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I think that's enough to be considered spam. NASCAR Fan24 18:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- comment Note that this AfD was created over the previous one which was closed as no consensus. See . JoshuaZ 18:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & nascar fan. ~ | twsx | cont | 18:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:N. BASE101() 18:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per spam. -- Magioladitis 01:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete can someone explain to why malls are listed on wikipedia at all?Ridernyc 17:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep notability is derived from economic impact - Citations and infobox added Exit2DOS2000 01:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- A community development 3-page glossy brochure is hardly a reliable proof of notable economic impact, is it?--Victor falk 08:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I also want to know the answer to Ridernyc's question. --Victor falk 03:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, passes WP:N with a great deal of press coverage of the topic throughout its history. , even the cinema opening Kappa 03:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is going be deleted as "spam" we can just make a new version anyway. Kappa 03:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. — pd_THOR | 08:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)