Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Yakalo: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:50, 14 October 2007 editSteven Walling (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators49,760 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:afd2 | pg=Yakalo | cat=T | text=Currently the article is a clear violation of WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. I attempted to find even some cursory source material i...'  Revision as of 21:51, 14 October 2007 edit undoSteven Walling (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators49,760 edits →YakaloNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:


:{{la|Yakalo}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Yakalo}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Currently the article is a clear violation of ]. I attempted to find even some cursory source material in an effort to expand on this topic, but was unable to find anything but Misplaced Pages mirrors even mentioning yak-buffalo crosses. This probably isn't a hoax, considering there are with mentions of the animal, but it obviously never caught on enough to maintain notability. A lack of sources to be used for verification and a doubtful notability in modern agriculture leads me to think this should simply be deleted. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Currently the article is a clear violation of ]. I attempted to find even some cursory source material in an effort to expand on this topic, but was unable to find almost anything but Misplaced Pages mirrors. This probably isn't a hoax, considering there are with mentions of the animal, but it obviously never caught on enough to maintain notability. A lack of sources to be used for verification and a doubtful notability in modern agriculture leads me to think this should simply be deleted. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:51, 14 October 2007

Yakalo

Yakalo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Currently the article is a clear violation of WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. I attempted to find even some cursory source material in an effort to expand on this topic, but was unable to find almost anything but Misplaced Pages mirrors. This probably isn't a hoax, considering there are news archives with mentions of the animal, but it obviously never caught on enough to maintain notability. A lack of sources to be used for verification and a doubtful notability in modern agriculture leads me to think this should simply be deleted. VanTucky 21:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Categories: