| Revision as of 21:04, 29 April 2007 edit87.65.74.245 (talk) →Too complicated← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:28, 16 October 2007 edit undo72.88.251.198 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ::i think Theonlyedge probly read a random paragraph in the middle, or fixated on that compilcated looking formula and said "too complex". If you read hte article from the begining, its "too simple"! ] 23:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | ::i think Theonlyedge probly read a random paragraph in the middle, or fixated on that compilcated looking formula and said "too complex". If you read hte article from the begining, its "too simple"! ] 23:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| This is honestly retarded. This is like saying a straight in poker is mathamatically important. ] | |||
| ----- | ----- | ||
Revision as of 09:28, 16 October 2007
Too complicated
This is unneccesarily complex. Could the author, or someone who understands what is being discussed simplify the text. Thanks, Theonlyedge 21:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Could you be a little more specific as to what makes you think the article is "unneccesarily complex"? I know summation notation (mathematical formulas using the Greek letter Σ) can look scary to some people, but I thought that the listing of actual pandigital numbers (12345678900, 12345678901, etc.) made the concept more understandable, and I actually worried that the ideas might be so simple and obvious as to appear condescending. PrimeFan 22:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- i think Theonlyedge probly read a random paragraph in the middle, or fixated on that compilcated looking formula and said "too complex". If you read hte article from the begining, its "too simple"! Numerao 23:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
This is honestly retarded. This is like saying a straight in poker is mathamatically important. AtrusRand
Error in number 987654521, should be 987654321