Revision as of 05:27, 17 September 2007 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Automatically signing comment made by 222.152.101.104← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:28, 16 October 2007 edit undoDave.massive (talk | contribs)3 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
A second for that. The Greek pronunciation would suggest "nus" with a long U, but "noetic" suggests a double long "O" as in German. ??? | A second for that. The Greek pronunciation would suggest "nus" with a long U, but "noetic" suggests a double long "O" as in German. ??? | ||
==The "History of Concept" section== | |||
There are two different umlaut'ed spellings of the word: 'noösphere' and 'nöosphere'. Which one is right? --] 15:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
==The "See Also" section== | ==The "See Also" section== |
Revision as of 15:28, 16 October 2007
If you can write an article about Raymond's Homesteading the Noosphere, please go ahead and do so. I've tried reading the whole thing and found it too hard to follow. How about summarizing it in a new Misplaced Pages article to be called Homesteading the Noosphere, please? --Ed Poor
- Thanks, Brion. --Ed Poor
- I read it when it first came out and it seemed to make some kind of sense at the time, but I don't remember the details too clearly. I'll try to expand the stub when I get a chance to reread. --Brion VIBBER
(cur) (last) . . 13:26, 31 Mar 2004 . . David Gerard (rv Vogelspam (the noosphere is not about white separatism))
That is right, David, the "noosphere" is related to cosmotheism, and white separatism ,alone, is NOT what cosmotheism itself, is really all about, whatsoever! (rv POV Gerardspam)
I removed the "nousphere" spelling. I've never seen it spelled that way, and Google has 100 references for it versus 137,000 for noosphere. Isidore 19:03, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I put it back because it is a redirect to this page, if you want to get nousphere removed, then get the redirect vfd'ed. According to the Misplaced Pages:manual of style, all alternative names should appear in the opening paragraph bolded. I don't care if the word stays or goes, I am just following the rules. --metta, The Sunborn ☥ 21:32, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
How about a little blurb on pronunciation?
A second for that. The Greek pronunciation would suggest "nus" with a long U, but "noetic" suggests a double long "O" as in German. ???
The "History of Concept" section
There are two different umlaut'ed spellings of the word: 'noösphere' and 'nöosphere'. Which one is right? --Dave.massive 15:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
The "See Also" section
This section seems to be a bit cluttered with all sorts of references that are only marginally relevant. I think we ought to establish some criteria for what belongs there; Noosphere should not be treated as a catch-all phrase for any sort of "new age" material that someone wants to promote (like, for example, the Blood Music film.) --HK 21:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- How about: the linked article must contain the term "noosphere". — goethean ॐ 23:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well, that would certainly pare down the list a bit. --HK 23:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
The folowing sentence could use some elaboration. A somewhat different approach focuses on "sustainability," and begins to look at this concept in terms of "co-evolution" . --200.77.174.153 06:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Removing memetics category
I am removing the memetics category from this article since you learn no more about the article's contents from the category and v.v. Since so many things may be memes we should try to keep the category closely defined in order to remain useful. Hope you're okay with that. The link to meme would be enough I suggest. Facius 17:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
nousphere
Nousphere: Is a notion offered by Tielhard de Chardin, Jesuit Priest and world renowned anthrapologist, he referred to the biosphere as sphere of life, lithosphere as sphere of rock, and nousphere as sphere of thought. Some would have it that the web is a practical expression of de Chardin's nousphere, but this is far to simplistic for what he intended, best see it as the tenuous framework of thought linking people in societies, and now via the web, does link people across social boundaries. Nousphere is perhaps best expressed as Popper's World III which is a less spiritual idea but nonetheless a sharp and profound expression of the idea behind the nousphere. I am sure Popper and de Chardin would have found much in common. Nousphere could be seen as the core of culture, carried forward via Poppers World III, and existing beyond any individual, forming the glue of the society binding people together today, and binding generations together. I see the nousphere as humankind's rudder, giving ideological and moral direction. It is a rudder influecing all but influenced by only the few. Graham Little —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.152.101.104 (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)