| Revision as of 07:56, 16 October 2007 editMike Rosoft (talk | contribs)Administrators67,164 edits Response | Revision as of 21:03, 18 October 2007 edit undoSgt. bender (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users873 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| I have deleted the article, because as far as I could see, it had no encyclopedic content and consisted just of your opinions stated as a fact. If you disagree with the deletion, you may nominate it for undeletion at ]. - ] 07:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | I have deleted the article, because as far as I could see, it had no encyclopedic content and consisted just of your opinions stated as a fact. If you disagree with the deletion, you may nominate it for undeletion at ]. - ] 07:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Deletion== | |||
| I see that they're trying to take down a good page. They're also trying to take down another political page: Gary Hayes. I'll endorse keeping Ultraconservatism. If you can help with Gary Hayes, that would be cool. | |||
Revision as of 21:03, 18 October 2007
Ultraconservatism
I have deleted the article, because as far as I could see, it had no encyclopedic content and consisted just of your opinions stated as a fact. If you disagree with the deletion, you may nominate it for undeletion at deletion review. - Mike Rosoft 07:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Deletion
I see that they're trying to take down a good page. They're also trying to take down another political page: Gary Hayes. I'll endorse keeping Ultraconservatism. If you can help with Gary Hayes, that would be cool.