| Revision as of 07:30, 14 October 2007 editBharatveer (talk | contribs)4,593 edits rm anon's personal attacks← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:29, 21 October 2007 edit undoBharatveer (talk | contribs)4,593 edits archivingNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; | : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; | ||
| : Nov 7th - Dec 4th; | : Nov 7th - Dec 4th; | ||
| : Dec 5th 2006 - 21st October 2007; | |||
| ------- | |||
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |||
| ==Rv in ]== | |||
| Reverting unnecesary ruthlessness was absolutely ok. But in the process, you reveretd a new section as well - the section on cuisine, under "culture"! Regards.--] (]) 17:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Venu62 is making destructive edits == | |||
| Please revert http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Youngcvb.jpg to its earlier version. I cant do it anymore since I might violate the ] rule. Venu62 is on a rampage tagging properly licensed images with copyvio tags - I guess this what is called vandalism. Maybe people who are familiar with his destructive POV edits should complain against him collectively. <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 19:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| This one too http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Image:Chembai2.jpg&action=history <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000"><big>ॐ</big> ] (] | ])</span> 19:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Just a suggestion; take care when reverting so called destructive reverts. The person who has asked you to suggested complaining as a group is in enough trouble as it is. ] 23:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Just wanted to say thanks for your wonderful and valuable contributions to the ] article. Thanks ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 07:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for reverting your reverts. You will agree that the passage is NPOV and is fully cited. I thank you for your help in this regard. I mean it sincerely. Cheers ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 09:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == please see ] == | |||
| please see ] | |||
| bye ] 10:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I've reverted your edit to ]. Until a consensus is reached on the talk page, the version which does not accuse someone of committing a massacre is the safest version to keep. I understand that there are sources calling it a massacre, but clearly there is some disagreement over their reliability. Please do not revert again, or I will protect the page. --] 14:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Elst == | |||
| Bharatveer, I must ask you to not revert without discussing on the talk page, or at least answering the points raised in an edit summary. On the Elst page, I noted that an alleged connection to the ] is sensibly viewed as controversial, as that party is banned in Elst's home country of Belgium. It would be missing a great deal to reduce the relevant paragraph to merely 'influences'. Please discuss on the talk page. ] 11:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| =="samskritam"== | |||
| bho bhaarata-veera, ko-yam khalu "upa-yojakah"? api ca samskrite "maadhyamika" iti maivam prayujyate, bhaashaayam-eva. vijayasva saumya!] 06:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hindutva revert === | |||
| Dear Bharatveer, May I know the reason for revert. I hope the content has enough evidance to proof my claims and I can't expect such act from Bharatveer. Please explain me why was my contents reverted? with love] 13:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| Can you please tell me what is incorrect in the following sentence? | |||
| ''A very few people whose Sanskrit names end in "a" are given the plural suffix "-r" rather than normal "n" because they are revered, but this is extremely inconsistent - for example, {{IAST|]}} becomes {{IAST|Śankarācāryar}} but ] becomes Agastyan.'' | |||
| I notice that you keep removing it from the article. Thanks. --]<sup></span>]]</sup> 19:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I added my 2c to the discussion. But I still don't see why that point it removed. The inconsistency is mentioned. The -r ending is actually very rare for Gods/Sages/Revered Persons. It's mostly -n. Maybe that point can be rewritten? --]<sup></span>]]</sup> 03:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RE: IP == | |||
| I have clarified on AN/I. I think it is ] as the IP is in the same range that he uses.--] 12:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Bharatveer, I urge you to review our ] policy before reverting. That something is sourced isn't enough: it must be ''reliably''sourced, fairly characterized, neutrally presented and given due weight (which in some cases can mean exclusion) relative to the biography as a whole.] 08:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| pls respond. ] 13:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :what i'm removing is not "referenced info". the reference provided does not actually support the text added. EMS makes no statement referring to Thapar's "role in the development of application of Marxist thought in the field of Indian history and ''philosophy''" - He is speaking of Debiprasad and Kosambi, not Thapar. ] 13:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::i repeat. text and a url do not make "referenced information". as i've pointed out atleast 3 times, ''the reference provided does not actually support the text added''. if you disagree, discuss, substantiate or ask for a third opinion. don't just keep re-adding dubious information into a BLP. ] 12:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::''We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high quality references. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — '''whether negative, positive, or just questionable''' — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Misplaced Pages articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space.'' - ] (emph mine) ] 12:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::for a start, try , , ] and ]. ] 13:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::for starters, that's not what the text you added says. the source has nothing to say about Thapar's "pioneering role in the development of application of Marxist thought in the field of Indian philosophy". probably because Thapar hasn't been applying Marxist thought to Indian philosophy, instead, she's been following through with Kosambi's ] approach to study ancient Indian societies and their organisation. when we fix a a good source for this (eg. ) , we'll add this info. till then, we can do without mentions of various people who dropped Thapar's name littering the section on Thapar's work. that the mention of her name (as one of a "host", does that tell you anything?) is "great recognition" is your interpretation, an iffy one when you consider the lavish praise EMS doles out to Kosambi and Debiprasad and contrasts with the "she exists" mention he makes of Thapar. ] 13:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Invitation== | |||
| You discussed the name of ] the last time it came up; you may be interested in doing so again. See ]. ] <small>]</small> 00:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Being watchful == | |||
| I see you are an experienced and watchful and keep an eye on many topics by deleteing POV and vandalism. Can you tell whether these reverts in the name of "reverting edits by a banned user" (about 25 such reverts in different articles without mentioning which user) are just. Also the user changed figures in ] and keeps trolling on ] talkpage. Please help. | |||
| ]] 13:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| May I respectfully ask why you reverted the recent edits to the article above? | |||
| I thought I made all changes based on WP Biography style guidelines. ] 06:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Indian astronomy== | |||
| I added a well sourced section "Merucentric Astronomy in ] at the insistence of SteveMcCluskey who is interested in History of Science Project. You (Bharatveer) '''reverted without discussing'''. See 'Discuss Before Reverting' in Talk:]. Some important and correct statements were also reverted, and references deleted. History may contain wrong or unclear ideas, but we should not delete history. -- ] 11:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I accept your apology. It's nice to see you are at least willing to face such defects. ] <small>]</small> 13:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::To DAB : The sentence "History may contain wrong or unclear ideas, but we should not delete history." refers to Merucentric history which was the tpoic of discussion, and not to my or your personal history. I am surprised at your (DAB's) incompetence in interpreting simple English. One who has abused without provocation asks for apology ! You were wondering how Meru shifted to North Pole, or wherefrom Tilak got his Arctic Homeland idea . Besides, my edits in ] included something on Aryabhata's relation with Brahmagupta and Varah Mihir, which you should have seen before supporting a wrong version instead of mine. It will augment your knowledge about India. -Vinay Jha. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:14:10:24, August 19, 2007 (UTC)| 14:10:24, August 19, 2007 (UTC)}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :::Ofcourse , user:dAb is very famous for his everlasting courtesy and politeness. All wikipedians should get lessons from him. Atleast they should know about this. ] .-] 07:53, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::you are a small marvel of courtesy yourself, Bharatveer, credit where credit is due. I must really have made a lasting impression on you in that Rajput debate, mustn't I. ] <small>]</small> 12:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Nanda devi op by ]== | |||
| Hello, Bharatveer I found that you have to the ] page about the failure of elint op on the premise of ''speculative info'', however if i may draw your attention that more than three books and quite a number of websites bear out the same story we find that the story seems quite authentic. Moreover if we are to categorise these info as ''speculative'' then almost the entire page on R&AW needs to be deleted because there is almost nil ''authentic official'' info on R&AW, hence i shall request you to revisit your decision ] 08:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Hi, Bharatveer, I hope you have no probs if i revert your edit. Do feel free to contact me if you think it is unjustified ] 10:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Bharatveer! Noticed the weasel tag that you left on the article. Would be more useful if you can also highlight in the talkpage on parts that you are uncomfortable with, so that it would make things easier. Thanks. <font color="Orange"><b>]</b></font><sup><i> <font color="green">]</font></i></sup> 14:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Out of India theory == | |||
| Bharatveer now you have reverted 3 times ,<br>] 19:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==] and ]== | |||
| Hi, I noticed you have udnertook some editing in the ] page. If you have a look in the page history and the ] page, you will notice that ]] may have taken an issue with my earlier edits win the ] section regarding the last decade of the ] and the ]. It is possible that he may have come under impression that I making a PoV edit to promote ] and the ], which I have explained I am not. I have explained my edits ] and ] I would like it if you gave your opinions on this issue in the talk page since I felt the page was an extremely condensed form of the movement which actually gave a factually wrong impression, and I would like it if this was addressed in the article even if my edits have to be modified for this.Your views would be appreciated.] 01:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR violation == | |||
| Hi Bharatveer, you have violated the 3RR at ] and I've reported this at ]. ] (]) 16:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| Blocked for a week. This is not the first time. In future this sort of conduct will be dealt with much more seriously. ] <sup> ]</sup> 16:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for arbitration concerning your conduct == | |||
| Please see . ] <sup> ]</sup> 14:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I have unblocked your account so that you may participate in the arbitration process. Regards, ~ ] 02:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Please, please be aware that my unblock is a pure technicality, and expressly ''not'' an endorsement of your actions, nor any sort of statement about the correctness of Moreschi's block. I am placing a bit of faith in you not to act in the same way that got you blocked - please try to keep it together. ~ ] 12:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Issue with ] == | |||
| I was disappointed to see that you are supporting the bulk addition of unsourced material by an editor who has been warned many times about ] and ]: . Do you suggest that I apply fact tags to every sentence in the article? ] 09:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, | |||
| An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] 15:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:29, 21 October 2007
Welcome!
Archive 1: February 2006 - May 2006 ; Archive2 : June 2006 - July 2006 ; Archive3 : Aug 1st,2006 - Aug 9th,2006 ; Archive4 : Aug 10th 2006 - Aug 31st 2006; Archive5 : Sept 1st 2006 - Sept 12th 2006; Archive6 : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; Archive7 : Nov 7th - Dec 4th; Archive8 : Dec 5th 2006 - 21st October 2007;