| Revision as of 15:12, 25 October 2007 editBasejumper2 (talk | contribs)131 edits →Hello← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:49, 25 October 2007 edit undoYidisheryid (talk | contribs)5,331 edits →HelloNext edit → | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| :Feel free to email me whenever u see a discussion about me sometimes i don't know where they all are.--] 12:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | :Feel free to email me whenever u see a discussion about me sometimes i don't know where they all are.--] 12:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| I was accused of being your sockpuppet, or of you being mine. Anyways...I followed IZAKs accusations to you sockpuppet trial. I couldn't tell if you were found guilty or not, or what happened. Care to share? ] 15:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | I was accused of being your sockpuppet, or of you being mine. Anyways...I followed IZAKs accusations to you sockpuppet trial. I couldn't tell if you were found guilty or not, or what happened. Care to share? ] 15:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| : 2 users have expressed Izak's concern, of which one has no contribution at all and is probably Izak's puppet, and 4 have dismissed it as pure disruption against me. i was guilty of vote sacking on which i apologized to the community thus the discussion was closed. Please be aware that Izak has a mailing list where he calls all his friends to vote like him so don't get offended when his accusations has suddenly a few other users jumping on u, i was through all this and i know not to be bothered by his antiques anymore.--] 16:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:49, 25 October 2007
| This is Yidisheryid's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
(I'll usually write back on my talk page. Thanks!) Template:Archive box collapsible
Slander?
You have claimed that Rabbi Noach Weinberg was scandalously divorced from his first wife (see the first point "4" at Template talk:JewishOutreach#Aliyah isn't part of Jewish outreach) I have underlined the offending and possibly libelous statements:
- "Fully agree, Rav Wienberg is a genies, but he is what he is. But he has done allot of good in Kiruv and probably one of its biggest pioneers and leaders. This is no question a premise nobody will argue with. If i call Bil Clinton A genius and the worlds best communicater it does not mean he is perfect, #################################################3."
As well as in your later point "3" also at Template talk:JewishOutreach#Aliyah isn't part of Jewish outreach:
- "Rav Wienberg is indeed the biggest achiever in this field and therefore by all means he is a holy Jew. as r' shlomeleh kariblach would say the holiest of the holiest, #####################################, but in no way does this diminish his holiness, this man is above all Jews alive today, not because of his of his teachings, but only because of his merits, he did not personally teach all Jews, but he is the motivator of so many countless rabbis institutions activists and jews to do good, i as a reader of reb Zelig Pliskin's books, which is on his payroll will be the last person on earth to talk negative about this giant rav wienberg. I was just defending him from your accusations that he uses Aliya in his approach, this is false he uses the funds but spends it not on Aliya, this is clearly a trick since Rav Weinberg is a Hareidi and does not follow rav kooks way in Judaism. Again Aliya is not a factor at all in his approach."
Unless you can verify this information with a reliable source it may be a violation of WP:LIBEL, because a Google search shows the school Rabbi Weinberg's wife heads as EYAHT (see also Aish HaTorah#Women's programs and there is nothing about this matter in the Rabbi Noach Weinberg article.) See the official website of the school headed by Rabbi Weinberg's wife:
- "Rebbetzin Denah Weinberg, wife of the Rosh Yeshiva of Aish HaTorah International, Rabbi Noach Weinberg, is the dean of the college. In her role, she inspires, educates and challenges her students to think about their lives, both internal and external. The highly qualified, diverse faculty of 20 Rebbetzins and Rabbis who join Rebbetzin Weinberg in conveying the beauty of Judaism provide the students with role models and often become warm life-long friends."
If you cannot substantiate your serious claims, kindly strike your comments using <s> </s> so that Misplaced Pages not be placed in the embarrassing situation of having to explain how such comments were allowed to remain on its website/s. Thank you, IZAK 12:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note I will delete it.--יודל 12:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sure Yidisheryid: You're welcome. A Gieten Shabbes. IZAK 12:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note I will delete it.--יודל 12:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Yidisheryid, maybe to be on the safe side also delete this entire section User talk:Yidisheryid#Slander?. Sincerely, IZAK 13:05, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- The issue is out there, but my claims should not have been written by me, so i erased it from here as well, without deleting your comments which i leave to your decision to delete yourself if you feel it important.--יודל 13:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I have no problem with my request and I appreciate your response. We can't take chances in putting everything in print especially about living people because Misplaced Pages has had some serious cases against it because of such things. All you need is one Aish HaTorahnik to latch on to these comments and who knows what they could claim. So better to err on the side of caution and leave it out. IZAK 13:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- The Aish'nices are the most open minded people i don't think it bothers them one bit to see that a Wienberg is bad mouthed but i should not have done it.--יודל 14:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I have no problem with my request and I appreciate your response. We can't take chances in putting everything in print especially about living people because Misplaced Pages has had some serious cases against it because of such things. All you need is one Aish HaTorahnik to latch on to these comments and who knows what they could claim. So better to err on the side of caution and leave it out. IZAK 13:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Using the welcome template
Hi, I noticed you placed a welcome message on a new user's page. However you must be very careful because the message failed to be full. You need to type the welcome message in this exact way: {{subst:welcome}} make sure it starts with "subst" and spell "welcome" correctly. There are also other templates you may want to use to welcome new users, see: Misplaced Pages:Welcoming committee/Welcome templates and Category:Welcome templates. Hope this helps, IZAK 06:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks--יודל 06:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Shalom
It is good, finally, to discover a Wikipedian who understands and appreciates the importance of exposing to the world the horrible history behind that Warrant for Genocide and The Non-Existent Manuscript. I was becoming extremely discouraged with the general lack of understanding over this very important subject matter. So I'm so glad to have discovered your point of view. Best to you. Yours truly, --Ludvikus 13:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks--יודל 13:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- I just noticed that you know User:IZAK. I would like to make Peace with him. I tried contacting him on his page. But he ignored me. Maybe you understand that anyone who touches the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is likely to get his hands dirty]]. I think that's what has happened between us. I do not know how to request a third opinion. Can you help me with that? In particular, I would like to make Peace with IZAK. IZAK has questioned my integrity - I think because I'm the substantial editor who has posted all these articles about this hateful Antisemitic garbage. I really think he and I are on the same side - but he thinks otherwise because I've elected to bring this hateful trash out of the night and into the light of day where, hopefully, the light of the Sun may distroy it. I appreciate it very much if you do your Jewish duty and help me make Peace with IZAK - unless, of course he now rejects you because you voted for a strong keep against his nomination for the deletion of all thirteen (13) artcles (I'm kidding - but it's for emphasis). I believe that you and I agree that it's best for the Jewish people for the world to be fully educated about this plagiarism, fraud, hoax, and many other evil things. I imagine it to be "Satan's Bible." Shalom again. --Ludvikus 14:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- only e-mails will do it. write to him personally your honest opinion and he will soften his position, if u look back in my history u can see that Izak has tried to delete all my work, half of it he succeeded the other half i saved and labored and corrected it according to the will of others. I emailed him and he honestly said that he may soften his position, I did not try yet to see if he is going to hold his word, but know that he is human just like all of us, show him humility and love and he will mirror his emotions, in the end of the day whoever has more time to fight will win, unfortunately Izak has more time now than me, but i beg u to talk to him privately as he tends to be different in email than in public where his glory isn't at stake, like all of us. I wish u good luck, because i am now very happy somebody has the energy and time to collaborate with Izak who is the most vigorous and relentless Jewish user here, therefore you both will make this a better wikipedia. thanks to both of you.--יודל 14:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- I just noticed that you know User:IZAK. I would like to make Peace with him. I tried contacting him on his page. But he ignored me. Maybe you understand that anyone who touches the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is likely to get his hands dirty]]. I think that's what has happened between us. I do not know how to request a third opinion. Can you help me with that? In particular, I would like to make Peace with IZAK. IZAK has questioned my integrity - I think because I'm the substantial editor who has posted all these articles about this hateful Antisemitic garbage. I really think he and I are on the same side - but he thinks otherwise because I've elected to bring this hateful trash out of the night and into the light of day where, hopefully, the light of the Sun may distroy it. I appreciate it very much if you do your Jewish duty and help me make Peace with IZAK - unless, of course he now rejects you because you voted for a strong keep against his nomination for the deletion of all thirteen (13) artcles (I'm kidding - but it's for emphasis). I believe that you and I agree that it's best for the Jewish people for the world to be fully educated about this plagiarism, fraud, hoax, and many other evil things. I imagine it to be "Satan's Bible." Shalom again. --Ludvikus 14:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Yidisheryid and Ludvikus: Thanks for the frank exchange of views here. Believe it or not I do not have limitless time to write via Email. While I recently did engage in a lengthy Email correspondence with Yidisheryid, I cannot always do so. May I suggest that for now, we try to focus ourselves and keep all communications brief and to the point without getting into deeper analyses of each other. So If you keep your messages short I will be glad to respond on my user page or on any other Misplaced Pages talk page. Let's keep things in the open and on the record as I find it creates a sobering atmosphere, where others can also contribute if they so desire. Thanks again, IZAK 03:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- see policy of WP:DR, the first words: Try to avoid arguments. When this is not possible, try talking privately to those involved.--יודל 11:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, have you heard of the expression the Pot calling the kettle black? IZAK 06:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- so now somebody is a hypocrite... somebody needs to cool off and resist heated accusations, and yes that is the second policy after emailing in the WP:DR page.--יודל 11:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, have you heard of the expression the Pot calling the kettle black? IZAK 06:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- see policy of WP:DR, the first words: Try to avoid arguments. When this is not possible, try talking privately to those involved.--יודל 11:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
NYC meetup
I've set up a secondary meetup time of 8 PM at the Brooklyn Museum for those who can't make it earlier because of Shabbat.--Pharos 04:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- beautiful, thanks--יודל 11:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
CYCO Yiddish Encyclopedia
I've written a summary of the proposed project at meta:Wikimedia New York City/CYCO Yiddish Encyclopedia. Your further, input, as well as your bringing this to the attention of others who would be able to help, would be appreciated. Thanks.--Pharos 08:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- I have brought it to the attention in yi wikipedia community portal.--יודל 11:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Hello, I read your name in various discussions lately, so I thought I'd drop by and say hello. Basejumper2 12:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Feel free to email me whenever u see a discussion about me sometimes i don't know where they all are.--יודל 12:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I was accused of being your sockpuppet, or of you being mine. Anyways...I followed IZAKs accusations to you sockpuppet trial. I couldn't tell if you were found guilty or not, or what happened. Care to share? Basejumper2 15:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- 2 users have expressed Izak's concern, of which one has no contribution at all and is probably Izak's puppet, and 4 have dismissed it as pure disruption against me. i was guilty of vote sacking on which i apologized to the community thus the discussion was closed. Please be aware that Izak has a mailing list where he calls all his friends to vote like him so don't get offended when his accusations has suddenly a few other users jumping on u, i was through all this and i know not to be bothered by his antiques anymore.--יודל 16:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)