Misplaced Pages

Talk:Tolkāppiyam: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:04, 25 January 2005 editSundar (talk | contribs)Administrators8,906 edits vEtRumai urubu← Previous edit Revision as of 12:06, 25 January 2005 edit undoSundar (talk | contribs)Administrators8,906 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The dating of the tolkaappiyam supplied (600BC) is probably too far back in time. Most historians place it at 500BC~200BC. Additionally, this article is marred by hyperbole - can the people-who-know update this page with more concrete information?

:Can you provide the concrete proof for your counter argument. If so, we can fix it up. --] 05:56, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I am very much interested (and have done some work on this) in contributing material on the scientific manner in which TolKaappiyam describes Tamil Grammar. Will do so in the coming days. Not very much knowledgable about the history though. -- ] 14:50, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

:Thanks Sundar, I appreciate it. --] 06:29, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

== vEtRumai urubu == == vEtRumai urubu ==


Line 9: Line 17:
:Perhaps it might mean ], which is a type of word which functions just like a preposition but comes after the noun phrase rather than before. — ] 11:46, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC) :Perhaps it might mean ], which is a type of word which functions just like a preposition but comes after the noun phrase rather than before. — ] 11:46, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)


Even I think so. Let's add this info. -- ] 12:04, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC) Ya, after coming across that, even I feel that would be appropriate. -- ] 12:06, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

== Alphabets ==

Both this article and ] use the word ''alphabet'''s''''' in the plural sever times over in contexts which make it quite clear that the correct word should be either ''letters'' or ''characters''. Is this a mere oversight or is there some reason for it? — ] 11:46, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

:It was partially due to the fact that I am not a native English speaker. Thanks for pointing out. Will correct that. -- ] 12:01, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:06, 25 January 2005

The dating of the tolkaappiyam supplied (600BC) is probably too far back in time. Most historians place it at 500BC~200BC. Additionally, this article is marred by hyperbole - can the people-who-know update this page with more concrete information?

Can you provide the concrete proof for your counter argument. If so, we can fix it up. --Rrjanbiah 05:56, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I am very much interested (and have done some work on this) in contributing material on the scientific manner in which TolKaappiyam describes Tamil Grammar. Will do so in the coming days. Not very much knowledgable about the history though. -- Sundar 14:50, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks Sundar, I appreciate it. --Rrjanbiah 06:29, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

vEtRumai urubu

Does some one know the English equivalent of vEtrumai urubu? -- Sundar 11:35, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)

Doesnt it mean prepostion(though not exactly?) -- Sanjeeth

Yeah, I'm concerned about the not exactly part. Actually it is the English equivalent, as you know, but the actual position in the sentence syntax is very different from that of Tamil. I remember having read something similar being called a conjugal. -- Sundar 06:14, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)

Perhaps it might mean postposition, which is a type of word which functions just like a preposition but comes after the noun phrase rather than before. — Hippietrail 11:46, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Ya, after coming across that, even I feel that would be appropriate. -- Sundar 12:06, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

Alphabets

Both this article and Tamil language use the word alphabets in the plural sever times over in contexts which make it quite clear that the correct word should be either letters or characters. Is this a mere oversight or is there some reason for it? — Hippietrail 11:46, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

It was partially due to the fact that I am not a native English speaker. Thanks for pointing out. Will correct that. -- Sundar 12:01, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)